Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2017; 23(34): 6350-6356
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6350
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6350
Table 1 Clinical and pathological data of the patients
Variable | Group U | Group B | P value |
Age (yr) | 58.0 ± 11.4 | 61.8 ± 11.4 | 0.030 |
Gender | 0.287 | ||
Male | 60 (75.9) | 54 (68.4) | |
Female | 19 (24.1) | 25 (31.6) | |
Pathological tumor stage | 0.822 | ||
IB | 3 (3.8) | 2 (2.5) | |
IIA | 31 (39.2) | 27 (34.2) | |
IIIB | 28 (35.4) | 29 (36.7) | |
IIIA | 17 (21.5) | 21 (26.6) | |
Operative time (min) | 154.8 ± 17.8 | 145.5 ± 15.1 | 0.001 |
Blood loss (mL) | 74.1 ± 26.7 | 74.0 ± 36.6 | 0.980 |
Table 2 Postoperative complications in the two groups n (%)
Item | Group U | Group B | P value |
Duodenal stump leakage | 1 (1.3) | 3 (3.8) | 0.620 |
Chylous fistula | 1 (1.3) | 0 | 1.000 |
Ileus | 1 (1.3) | 1 (1.3) | 1.000 |
Anastomotic bleeding | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 1.000 |
Intra-abdominal bleeding | 2 (2.5) | 2 (2.5) | 1.000 |
Incision infection | 1 (1.3) | 0 | 1.000 |
Gastroparesis syndrome | 0 | 0 | - |
A-loop syndrome | 0 | 1 (1.3) | 1.000 |
Total | 6 (7.6) | 8 (10.1) | 0.576 |
Table 3 Perioperative stomach pH values
Time | Group U | Group B | P value |
Preoperative | 1.97 ± 0.19 | 1.99 ± 0.21 | |
Day 1 | 6.38 ± 0.18 | 7.21 ± 0.36 | |
Day 2 | 6.28 ± 0.29 | 7.35 ± 0.32 | |
Day 3 | 6.48 ± 0.38 | 7.27 ± 0.38 | |
Day 4 | 6.64 ± 0.22 | 7.27 ± 0.35 | |
Day 5 | 6.56 ± 0.29 | 7.24 ± 0.42 | |
0.000 |
Table 4 The follow-up data
Item | Group U | Group B | P value |
3 mo later | n = 77 | n = 76 | |
Esophagogastroduodenal series | |||
Full emptying at 30 min | 59 (76.6) | 67 (88.2) | 0.061 |
Partial recanalization | 0 | - | - |
1 yr later | n = 69 | n = 72 | |
Heartburn | 7 (10.1) | 17 (23.6) | 0.033 |
Weight gain (kg) | -0.04 ± 3.6 | -0.18 ± 3.8 | 0.723 |
Endoscopic finding | |||
Residual food | 8 (11.6) | 3 (4.2) | 0.178 |
Grade 0 | 61 | 69 | |
Grade 1 | 7 | 3 | |
Grade 2 | 1 | 0 | |
Grade 3-4 | 0 | 0 | |
Gastritis | 38 (55.1) | 52 (72.2) | 0.044 |
Grade 0 | 31 | 20 | |
Grade 1 | 30 | 35 | |
Grade 2 | 8 | 17 | |
Grade 3-4 | 0 | 0 | |
Bile reflux | 42 (60.9) | 65 (90.3) | 0.000 |
Grade 0 | 27 | 7 | |
Grade 1 | 34 | 23 | |
Grade 2 | 8 | 42 | |
Partial recanalization | 9 (13.0) | - | - |
Biopsy of gastritis | 44 (63.8) | 51 (70.8) | 0.278 |
Grade 0 | 25 | 21 | |
Grade 1 | 39 | 45 | |
Grade 2 | 5 | 6 |
- Citation: Yang D, He L, Tong WH, Jia ZF, Su TR, Wang Q. Randomized controlled trial of uncut Roux-en-Y vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Which technique is better for avoiding biliary reflux and gastritis? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(34): 6350-6356
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i34/6350.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6350