Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2017; 23(34): 6315-6320
Published online Sep 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6315
Table 1 Data in 63 colorectal cancer patients
ParametersResults
Gender
Female25
Male38
Age (yr, mean, range)55.5 (28-86)
Location of cancer
Colon11
Rectum52
Differentiated grade
Well6
Moderately46
Poorly11
Affected lymph nodes
N035
N114
N214
Invasive depth
T11
T212
T339
T411
Table 2 Data in Metastasis V-positive patients
PatientsSexAge (yr)Cancer size (cm)Cancer locationDifferentiated gradeInvasive depthAffected lymph nodesTNM
1F372.5RectumPoorlySerosal8/15pT4N2M0
2F423RectumModeratelySubserosal5/17pT3N2M0
3M332RectumModeratelySerosal5/15pT4N2M0
4M486SigmoidWellSerosal12/21pT4N2M0
5F633RectumPoorlyMuscularis0/15pT2N2M0
6F453RectumModeratelySerosal5/28pT4N2M0
7M583RectumPoorlySubserosal8/12pT3N2M0
8M644RectumPoorlySubserosal7/15pT3N2M1
9M546RectumModeratelySubserosal2/13pT3N1M0
10F602Descending colonModeratelySubserosal0/17pT3NxM0
11M543RectumModeratelySerosal5/12pT4N2M0
12M583RectumModeratelySubserosal0/16pT3N0M0
13F573RectumPoorlySerosal2/21pT4N1M1
14M474RectumModeratelySubserosal24/32pT3N2M0
Table 3 Comparison between Metastasis V-positive patients and Metastasis V- negative patients
ParametersMetastasis V
P value
NegativePositive
Age (yr)NS
< 4583
≥ 45 and ≤ 59198
≥ 60223
Cancer size (cm)NS
≤ 32410
> 3 and < 5142
≥ 5112
GenderNS
Female196
Male308
Cancer locationNS
Colon92
Rectum4012
Differentiated gradeNS
Well51
Moderately388
Poorly65
Affected lymph nodes< 0.05
N0323
N1122
N259
Invasive depth< 0.05
T110
T2111
T3327
T456
Table 4 Comparison of preoperative CEA levels between Metastasis V-positive and Metastasis V-negative patients
ParametersMetastasis V
P value
NegativePositive
Median (ng/mL)34.27< 0.05
Grade< 0.05
High (> 15.00 ng/mL)55
Low (≤ 15.00 ng/mL)7316