Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2017; 23(17): 3111-3121
Published online May 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3111
Published online May 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3111
Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma and patients with typical hepatocellular carcinoma
eHCC | tHCC | P value | |
Number of nodules | 50 | 187 | |
Follow-up days1, median (range) | 1213 (216-2137) | 1116 (181-2328) | 0.1582 |
Age, mean (range) | 69.8 (50-87) | 71.6 (54-84) | 0.2002 |
Child-Pugh score, A/B | 49/1 | 179/8 | 0.0992 |
Tumor diameter in mm, mean (range) | 15.8 (10-23) | 15.6 (6-30) | 0.1542 |
Sex, male/female | 35/15 | 125/58 | 0.8343 |
Etiology, HCV/HBV/alcohol/others4 | 41/4/6/1 | 139/29/8/11 | 0.1985 |
Table 2 Evaluation of thinnest ablative margins for early hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 50) and typical hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 187) classified into two groups according to contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
eHCC | tHCC | P value1 | |
AM 0 to < 5 mm | 80% (40/50) | 85.5% (160/187) | NS |
AM ≥ 5 mm | 20% (10/50) | 14.4% (27/187) | NS |
Table 3 Frequency of local tumor progression classified into two groups according to ablative margin for early hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 50) and typical hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 187)
AM 0 to < 5 mm | AM ≥ 5 mm | |
Local tumor progression | ||
eHCC | 2.5% (1/40) | 0% (0/10) |
tHCC | 27.5% (44/160) | 7.4% (2/27) |
P value1 | 0.01 | NS |
- Citation: Hao Y, Numata K, Ishii T, Fukuda H, Maeda S, Nakano M, Tanaka K. Rate of local tumor progression following radiofrequency ablation of pathologically early hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(17): 3111-3121
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i17/3111.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i17.3111