Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2017; 23(16): 2964-2971
Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2964
Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2964
Table 1 Comparison between computer-assisted propofol sedation and midazolam fentanyl historical controls who underwent colonoscopy as single procedures
CAPS (n = 2677) | MF (n = 2286) | P value | |
Mean age (yr) | 59.9 ± 11.7 | 60.3 ± 11.6 | 0.685 |
Male sex | 48.7% | 49.8% | 0.427 |
Colonoscopy completion rate | 98.8% | 99.0% | 0.526 |
Polyp detection rate | 53.4% | 50.1% | 0.019 |
Large (≥ 1 cm) polyp detection rate | 8.2% | 8.2% | 0.961 |
Mean procedure time (min) | 22.2 ± 10.5 | 22.8 ± 9.3 | < 0.001 |
Mean recovery time (min) | 31.0 ± 14.4 | 45.6 ± 17.9 | < 0.001 |
Level of consciousness upon arrival at recovery unit - “Awake” | 83.3% | 49.2% | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Lin OS, La Selva D, Kozarek RA, Tombs D, Weigel W, Beecher R, Koch J, McCormick S, Chiorean M, Drennan F, Gluck M, Venu N, Larsen M, Ross A. One year experience with computer-assisted propofol sedation for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(16): 2964-2971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i16/2964.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2964