Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2016; 22(5): 1844-1853
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
Table 1 Overview on patient characteristics, indications and overall success rates
| Patients, n | 84 |
| Sex | 50 males |
| 34 females | |
| Age (yr), median | 71 (2-98) |
| Clip type | |
| 12/6T | 77 |
| 14/6T | 24 |
| OTSCs (n total) | 101 |
| Indication for OTSC placement | |
| Upper GI bleeding | 41 |
| Lower GI bleeding | 3 |
| Gastrointestinal perforation | 7 |
| Fistula | 3 |
| Bleeding prevention | 12 |
| Perforation prevention | 18 |
| Technical success | 78/84 (92.85%) |
| Clinical success | 75/84 (89.28%) |
Table 2 Indications and succes of over-the-scope-clip placement
| Indication | n | Technical success | Need for surgery | Death due to relapse | Death due to other cause |
| Perforation closure | |||||
| Incomplete perforation (laceration of mucosa/inner muscle layer) | |||||
| After mechanical stress at the level of the rectosigmoid | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
| After balloon dilation of pyloric stenosis | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
| Perforation | |||||
| After colonic EMR | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
| Due to colonic methane gas explosion | 1 | 1 | Yes | No | No |
| Intraoperative during cholecystectomy; perforation of a large duodenal diverticulum | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Prevention of secondary perforation after resective techniques | |||||
| EMR | |||||
| Esophageal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| Gastric EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| Duodenal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| Cecal EMR | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| EMR ascending colon | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Sigmoid EMR | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| ESD | |||||
| Esophageal ESD | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
| Rectal ESD | 5 | 5 | No | No | No |
| Hemostasis severe bleeding | |||||
| Upper GI bleeding | |||||
| Acute ulcer bleeding | |||||
| Forrest Ia | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Forrest Ib | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
| Forrest IIa | 23 | 23 | No | No | 4 |
| Forrest IIb | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Severe bleeding at GE junction after balloon dilation for achalasia | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Gastric adenocarcinoma | 1 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| Gastric lymphoma | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Lower GI bleeding | |||||
| Severe bleeding from rectal ulcer | |||||
| Forrest Ia | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| Forrest IIb | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Prevention of secondary bleeding after resective techniques | |||||
| EMR | |||||
| Gastric EMR | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Duodenal EMR | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
| Colorectal EMR | 3 | 3 | No | No | No |
| ESD | |||||
| Esophageal ESD | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
| Rectal ESD | 4 | 4 | No | No | No |
| Fistula closure | |||||
| After PEG removal | 2 | 2 | No | No | No |
| After dilation of pseudocyst access, false tract | 1 | 1 | No | No | No |
- Citation: Wedi E, Gonzalez S, Menke D, Kruse E, Matthes K, Hochberger J. One hundred and one over-the-scope-clip applications for severe gastrointestinal bleeding, leaks and fistulas. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(5): 1844-1853
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i5/1844.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
