Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2016; 22(41): 9057-9068
Published online Nov 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9057
Published online Nov 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9057
Bioactive molecule | Mouse | Rat | G.pig | Pig | Human | Clinical biomarker | Major mechanisms | Ref. |
TSG-6 | X | X | X | NA | X | X | Reduction of IL-6, IFN-γ, and TNF-α, induction of T-reg lymphocytes | [5,18,19,27,72-76] |
IDO | NA | X | X | X | Apoptosis of cytolytic lymphocytes, IL-10 induction T-reg proliferation | [13,15,16,52,77] | ||
iNOS | X | X | X | Inhibition of effector lymphocytes through IL-10 | [13,17] | |||
PGE2 | X | X | X | Macrophage conversion to M2 phenotype, NK cell inhibition, IDO induction | [12,78-80] | |||
IL-10 | X | X | X | X | X | X | T-reg lymphocyte Induction | [12,13,15,17,19,54,78] |
TGF-β | X | X | X | X | T-reg induction | [81-83] | ||
PD-L1 | X | X | X | X | CD8+ lymphocyte inhibition | [12] |
Ref. | Study design | Patients | Disease duration and characteristics | Assessment and follow-up | Source of cells | Dose | Safety outcomes (terminology) | Key safety results |
García-Olmo et al[84] (2005) | Phase 1 | 9 patients aged 32-46 | Diagnosis of CD at least 5 years before, unresponsive to medical treatment and unsuccessfully treated by classic surgery at least twice | Weekly follow-up for the first 8 wk, then monthly follow-up up max 30 mo | Autologous ASC | 3-30 × 106 | Not specified | No immediate adverse reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, allergic reactions) were observed in any of the cases studied |
Garcia-Olmo et al[85] (2009) | Open-label, multicenter, phase 2 | 24 patients with mean age = 52 received ASC+fibrin glue | Complex perianal fistula (either of cryptoglandular origin or associated with CD). In patients with CD, immunomodulators were used continuously for at least six months and stable for more than eight weeks | Week 8, 16 and then at 3-mo interval up to 12 months | Autologous ASC | 2-4 × 107 | Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events | 11 adverse events (at week 8), of which two were SAEs, but unrelated to ASC administration. In the following phase, 9 adverse event (perianal sepsis), unrelated to ASC administration |
Ciccocioppo et al[86] (2011) | Prospective study | 12 patients aged 16-44 (two drop outs) | Patients with CD unresponsive to or unsuitable for all previous medical treatment including biological agents or unsuccessfully treated by surgery | 3, 6 and 12 mo | Autologous BM-MSC | Median 20 × 106 | Changes in vital signs and adverse reactions during the first 6 h after each cellular treatment, and during the following 12-month follow-up | No changes in vital signs and no adverse events were recorded during the procedure and up to the end of the 6-h observation time, or during the 12-mo follow-up period |
Guadalajara et al[87] (2012) | Retrospective follow up of phase 2 | 24 patients with mean age = 42 | Patients enrolled in previous phase 2 study receiving at least one ASC administration | 8 wk, 1 yr | Autologous ASC | Not specified | Number of adverse events since the final visit of the phase II study (serious or not, severity, causality) | Ischiorectal abscess (patient treated with fibrin glue alone) and a perianal abscess (patient treated with ASCs plus fibrin glue), both toxicity grade I and unrelated to the study treatment. These events occurred at 13 and 21 mo after the original treatment, respectively |
Herreros et al[88] (2012) | Multicenter randomized single-blind Phase 3 + observational | 200 patients with mean age = 50 | Cryptoglandular complex fistula-in-ano (without CD) | 1, 4 and 12, 14 24, 26, 48 wk | Autologous ASC | 2 × 107 (± fibrin glue) | Incidence of adverse events and SAEs | Approximately 85%-90% of patients experienced an adverse event, but most of these were nonserious. There were 17 different AEs reported in more than 5% of the cases. The most frequent AEs were proctalgia (43.7%), abscess drainage (22.4%), pain (13.7%), perianal abscess (13.1%), pyrexia (0.3%), swelling (6.6%), and pruritus (6.6%). There were no statistically significant differences within groups. There were 37 SAEs in 30 patients. All but 4 SAEs were unrelated to study treatment |
Lee et al[89] (2013) | Open-label phase 2 | 43 patients with mean age = 26 | Perianal fistulae with CD in patients not treated with infliximab within 3 mo prior to ASC | 4, 6 and 8 wk, 10 mo | Autologous ASC | Depending on the fistula (mean from 15 to 19 × 107) | Systemic tolerance, adverse events and SAEs | Post-operative pain (60%), anal pain (19%) and anal bleeding (7%), unrelated to ASC administration. One hospitalization for vitamin B12 deficit; two grade 3/4 events (exacerbation of disease and peritonitis), unrelated to ASC administration |
de la Portilla et al[90] (2013) | Open-label phase 1/2a | 24 patients with mean age = 36 | Diagnosis of CD at least 12 mo before, presence of persistent and active complex perianal fistula with less than three fistulous tracts and/or external opening, non-active luminal CD; no treatment with infliximab or any other anti-TNF agent in the previous 8 wk or tacrolimus or cyclosporine in the previous 4 wk | 10, 12, 22, 24 wk | Allogeneic ASC | 2 × 107 (up to 4 × 107 if no effect) | Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events | 32 treatment-emergent adverse events during the study, the majority of which were of mild to moderate intensity. Five treatment-related AEs were reported: “anal abscess” (3 patients), “pyrexia” (1), and “uterine leiomyoma” (1). Only two SAEs: “pyrexia” and “perianal abscess”, considered to be possibly related to the study treatment and both patients were withdrawn from the study |
Ciccocioppo et al[91] (2015) | 5-year follow up of an open-label phase 2 | 8 patients with median age = 37 | Refractory CD or inability to undergo standard therapies | 12 mo until 5 yr | Autologous BM-MSC | Not specified | Systemic tolerance, adverse events and SAEs, as specified in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology | 23 adverse events, mainly consisting of abdominal pain, headache, anal inflammation, diarrhea, erythema, nausea, and fever. All AEs were consistent with exacerbation of the primary disease, but cholecystectomy due to the presence of gallstones. None was attributed to MSC therapy, and no evidence of tumor development or opportunistic infection |
Cho et al[92] (2013) | Open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation phase 1 | 10 patients with mean age = 26 | Perianal fistula associated with CD | Weeks 8, months 4,6 and 8 | Autologous ASC | 1, 2 and 4 × 107 to 40 × 107 | Adverse events reported after injection with ASCs, serious adverse events during study period, and laboratory toxicity observed after injection with ASCs. (CTCAE version 3.0) | 13 adverse events were reported in seven patients (70%). The adverse events, which were mild or moderate in severity, were not related to study drug. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events and no laboratory toxicity greater than grade 3 in this study. Adverse events reported in two or more patients included pain (n = 3) and diarrhea (n = 2). During the study period, two patients reported three SAEs of grade 2 (enterocolitis, seton application, and infliximab administration for new fistulas unrelated to the target fistula) requiring hospitalization |
Cho et al[93] (2015) | Retrospective analysis of 1-year follow up phase 2 | 42 patients with mean age = 26 | Average duration of CD of 58 mo | 2 yr | Autologous ASC | Average 16.4 × 107 | Systemic tolerance, adverse events, SAEs | 53 adverse events were reported in 30 patients (73.2%), the most common being abdominal pain (17.1%); eczema and exacerbation of disease (9.8%) and anal inflammation, diarrhea, and fever (7.3%). None was related to MSC administration |
Garcia-Olmo et al[62] (2015) | Observational | 28-76 | Recurrent perianal fistulae who previously undergone at least three surgical interventions | Week 8 and year 1 | Autologous ASC | Not specified | Not specified | No adverse reactions or complications related to MSC administration |
Molendijk et al[66] (2015) | Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study | > 18 | Actively draining perianal fistulizing CD (diagnosis at least 3 months before enrollment) refractory to conventional therapies | 6, 12, and 24 wk | Allogeneic BM-MSC | 1, 3 and 9 × 107 | Primary endpoint: incidence of serious adverse events at week 12. (CTCAE, version 3.0). Secondary end point: incidence of surgical intervention and infections at week 12 and 24 | No infusion reactions; one patient 2 developed fever 6 h after surgery. One patient in each group developed a perianal abscess that required surgical drainage. Reported adverse events: n = 17 (group 1, n = 5), 9 (group 2, n = 5), 10 (group 3, n = 5), 14 (placebo, n = 5). One patient (1 × 107) developed an adenocarcinoma of the cecum with peritoneal carcinomatosis > 15 mo after the surgical intervention |
Dhere et al[52] (2016) | Phase 1 safety trial | 18-52 | Established CD for at least 3 mo refractory to conventional therapies (lack of response to immunomodulators and/or biologics for at least 3 mo) | 1, 5 and 9 wk after infusion | Autologous BM-MSC | 2, 5 and 10 × 106 | Changes in respiratory or cardiovascular parameters during the 1 h infusion and for 4 h after. Temperature, heart rate, mean arterial pressure and respiratory rate assessed at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h and 4 h | No patient developed significant infusion reaction. SAEs in 7 patients, of which 2 likely to be related to MSC administration: appendicitis (with appendectomy 9 d after infusion and complete colectomy for medically refractory CD after 120 d) and C. difficile colitis (30 d after infusion) |
Panés et al[63] (2016) | Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial | 107 patients, mean age = 39 | Actively draining perianal fistulizing CD refractory to conventional therapies | 24 wk after local injection | Allogeneic ASC | 12 × 106 | TEAEs (MedDRA version 17.0) | 18 patients of the ASC treated group vs 30 of 107 in the placebo group developed treatment-related adverse events, (anal abscess and proctalgia) |
- Citation: Dothel G, Raschi E, Rimondini R, De Ponti F. Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy: Regulatory and translational aspects in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(41): 9057-9068
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v22/i41/9057.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9057