Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH, Kim TO, Kim HJ, Kim HW, Lee SH, Baek DH, (BIGS) BUGISGS. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(11): 3220-3226 [PMID: 27003999 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Seun Ja Park, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, 34 Amnam-dong, Seo-gu, Busan 602-702, South Korea. parksj6406@daum.net
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2016; 22(11): 3220-3226 Published online Mar 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220
Table 1 Characteristics of colon polyps visualized in the exam
n (%)
Size
< 5 mm
19 (47.5)
5 ≥ and < 10 mm
12 (30.0)
≥ 10 mm
9 (22.5)
Type
Sessile
23 (57.5)
Semi pedunculated
8 (20.0)
Pedunculated
5 (12.5)
LST
4 (10.0)
Location
Rectum
3 (7.5)
Sigmoid colon
8 (20.0)
Descending colon
7 (17.5)
Transverse colon
9 (22.5)
Ascending colon
11 (27.5)
Cecum
2 (5.0)
Histology
TA with LGD
27 (67.5)
TA with HGD
3 (7.5)
Chronic colitis
6 (15.0)
Serrated polyp
3 (7.5)
Inflammatory polyp
1 (2.5)
Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy and error range of the estimation of colon polyp size
Visual estimation
Forceps estimation
P value
Diagnostic accuracy
Beginners
0.613
0.734
< 0.001
Experts
0.680
0.784
< 0.001
Total
0.639
0.754
< 0.001
Error range (mm)
Beginners
1.68 ± 1.30
1.38 ± 1.08
< 0.001
Experts
1.42 ± 1.11
1.12 ± 1.11
< 0.001
Total
1.48 ± 1.18
1.20 ± 1.10
< 0.001
Table 3 Diagnostic accuracy and error range of the estimation of colon polyp size according to the actual polyp size
Visual estimation
Forceps estimation
P value
Diagnostic accuracy
≤ 5 mm
0.834
0.929
< 0.001
6-9 mm
0.508
0.692
< 0.001
≥ 10 mm
0.403
0.469
0.018
Error range (mm)
≤ 5 mm
0.90 ± 0.27
0.70 ± 0.17
< 0.001
6-9 mm
1.85 ± 0.82
1.30 ± 0.59
< 0.001
≥ 10 mm
2.71 ± 0.76
2.40 ± 0.67
< 0.001
Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of the estimation of colon polyp size according to the polyp type
Visual estimation
Forceps estimation
P value
Sessile type
0.709
0.818
< 0.001
Semi pedunculated type
0.627
0.703
0.344
Pedunculated type
0.608
0.638
0.432
LST type
0.556
0.757
0.012
Citation: Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee JH, Kim TO, Kim HJ, Kim HW, Lee SH, Baek DH, (BIGS) BUGISGS. Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(11): 3220-3226