Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2016; 22(11): 3196-3201
Published online Mar 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3196
Table 1 Associations between re-bleeding and patient characteristics n (%)
Re-bleedingNo re-bleedingP value
(n = 35)(n = 126)
Age (yr)63.0 (52.0-70.0)57.0 (46.5-71.0)0.121
Sex (male)23 (65.7)82 (65.1)0.944
White blood cell count (× 103/μL)8.1 (5.6-10.0)8.1 (6.0-10.7)0.673
Platelet count (× 103/μL)225 (122-262)215 (160-268)0.320
INR1.1 (1.0-1.5)1.1 (1.0-1.2)0.075
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)10.9 (2.3-22.3)6.5 (1.1-15.8)0.002
ESRD3 (8.6)10 (7.9)1.000
Decompensated liver cirrhosis4 (11.4%)4 (3.2)0.047
Use of anti-platelet regimen
Before ES3 (8.6)3 (2.4)0.117
Within 3 d after ES2 (5.7)2 (1.6)0.206
Cholangitis before ES13 (37.1)58 (46.0)0.349
Bleeding diathesis16 (45.8)22 (17.5)< 0.001
Table 2 Associations between re-bleeding and endoscopic retrograde cholangopancreatography n (%)
Re-bleedingNo re-bleedingP value
(n = 35)(n = 126)
Endoscopic diagnosis
Choledocholithiasis18 (51.4)86 (69.0)0.066
Malignant biliary stricture11 (31.4)7 (5.6)< 0.001
Benign biliary stricture3 (8.6)8 (7.1)0.706
Biliary leak0 (0.0)1 (0.8)1.000
Others4 (11.4)24 (19)0.571
Periampullary diverticulum6 (17.1)23 (18.3)0.880
Immediate post-ES bleeding14 (40.0)40 (31.7)0.360
Needle knife precut sphincterotomy6 (17.1)13 (10.3)0.372
Table 3 The association between re-bleeding and bleeding stigmata/treatment methods at initial endoscopic treatment for delayed bleeding n (%)
Re-bleedingNo re-bleedingP value
(n = 35)(n = 126)
Bleeding severity< 0.001
Mild1 (2.9)46 (36.5)
Moderate15 (42.9)65 (51.6)
Severe19 (54.3)15 (11.9)
Features of ES wound
Active bleeding27 (77.1)85 (67.5)0.271
Non-bleeding visible vessel4 (11.4)4 (3.2)0.047
Non-bleeding adherent clot4 (11.4)23 (18.3)0.517
Non-bleeding red spots0 (0.0)14 (11.1)0.041
Type of endoscopic therapy
Monotherapy13 (37.1)59 (46.8)0.342
Epinephrine injection7 (20.0)45 (35.7)0.102
Thermocoagulation6 (17.1)14 (11.1)0.385
Combination therapy122 (65.7)67 (53.2)0.342
Thermocoagulation21 (60.0)64 (50.8)0.347
Hemoclipping0 (0.0)1 (0.8)1.000
Thermotherapy + hemoclipping1 (2.9)2 (1.6)1.000
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses for predictors of re-bleeding
PredictorUnivariate
Multivariate
OR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP value
Malignant biliary stricture
No1
Yes7.792.74-22.14< 0.001
Serum bilirubin level1
≤ 1011
> 104.72.06-10.72< 0.0013.551.39-9.110.008
Bleeding severity
Mild11
Moderate10.621.354-83.220.02510.971.379-87.180.024
Severe58.277.18-472.79< 0.00148.745.90-402.93< 0.001
Bleeding diathesis
No1
Yes3.981.77-8.94< 0.001
Table 5 Treatment outcomes n (%)
Overall (n = 35)
Successful endoscopic hemostasis29 (82.9)
Only 1 session23
More than 1 session6
Mean endoscopic session (range)2.34 (2-7)
TAE/surgery required for hemostasis4/1 (14.3)
Bleeding-related death1 (2.8)