Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2015; 21(6): 1857-1864
Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1857
Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1857
Table 1 Clinical and pathological features of the concurrent carcinomas detected by computed tomography
| Concurrent lesions | Incomplete colonoscopy | P value | Complete colonoscopy | P value | ||
| CT+ (n = 13) | CT- (n = 16) | CT+ (n = 43) | CT- (n = 20) | |||
| Sex (M/F) | 8/5 | 11/5 | 26/17 | 16/4 | ||
| Median age (yr) | 63 | 69 | 66 | 63 | ||
| Mean maximum dimension (mm) | 38 ± 11 | 24 ± 5 | 0.02 | 37 ± 13 | 25 ± 9 | < 0.01 |
| Gross appearance | 0.20 | 0.18 | ||||
| Protruding | 9 | 7 | 23 | 10 | ||
| Ulcerated | 2 | 5 | 9 | 8 | ||
| Sclerotic | 2 | 4 | 11 | 2 | ||
| Differentiation | 0.17 | 0.06 | ||||
| Well | 3 | 4 | 9 | 8 | ||
| Moderate | 5 | 7 | 22 | 4 | ||
| Poor | 5 | 5 | 12 | 8 | ||
| Location | 0.71 | 0.41 | ||||
| Ascending colon | 5 | 4 | 14 | 6 | ||
| Transverse colon | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | ||
| Descending colon | 4 | 5 | 13 | 6 | ||
| Sigmoid colon | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 | ||
| Rectum | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Colonic obstruction | 0.46 | - | ||||
| Yes | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||
| No | 7 | 6 | 43 | 20 | ||
| Average distance to index tumor (cm) | 36.77 ± 6.86 | 19.88 ± 4.16 | 0.04 | 36.65 ± 3.55 | 24.00 ± 5.11 | 0.05 |
| Located in the same bowl segments with index tumor | 0.03 | 0.03 | ||||
| Yes | 3 | 11 | 13 | 12 | ||
| No | 10 | 5 | 30 | 8 | ||
Table 2 Anatomical distribution of index and concurrent cancers in this cohort
| Index lesion | Concurrent lesions | ||||
| Ascending colon | Transverse colon | Descending colon | Sigmoid colon | Rectum | |
| Incomplete group | |||||
| Ascending colon | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Transverse colon | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Descending colon | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Sigmoid colon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Rectum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 2 |
| Complete group | |||||
| Ascending colon | 10 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Transverse colon | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Descending colon | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | |
| Sigmoid colon | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Rectum | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 5 |
Table 3 Overall sensitivity and specificity in the two groups
| CT findings | Histological findings | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | ||
| Positive | Negative | Total | |||
| Incomplete group | 44.8 (26.5, 64.3) | 93.6 (90.5, 96.0) | |||
| Positive | 13 | 22 | 35 | ||
| Negative | 16 | 323 | 339 | ||
| Complete group | 68.3 (55.3, 79.4) | 97.0 (96.0, 97.8) | |||
| Positive | 43 | 51 | 94 | ||
| Negative | 20 | 1635 | 1655 | ||
| Total | 92 | 2031 | 2123 | ||
- Citation: Pang EJ, Liu WJ, Peng JY, Chen NW, Deng JH. Prediction of synchronous colorectal cancers by computed tomography in subjects receiving an incomplete colonoscopy: A single-center study. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(6): 1857-1864
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i6/1857.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1857
