Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2015; 21(42): 12071-12082
Published online Nov 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12071
Published online Nov 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12071
Name | Criteria | Ref. |
Milan | 1 tumor < 5 cm in diameter or | Mazzaferro et al[7] |
≤ 3 tumor nodules, each ≤ 3 cm in diameter | ||
No extrahepatic manifestation | ||
No vascular invasion | ||
Up-to-seven criteria (“new Milan”) | Seven as the sum of the size of the largest tumor (in cm) and the number of tumors | Mazzaferro et al[166] |
Kyoto | ≤ 10 tumors, all ≤ 5 cm in diameter | Takada et al[167] |
PIVKA-II > 400 mAU/mL | ||
UCSF | Solitary tumor ≤ 6.5 cm or | Yao et al[9] |
≤ 3 nodules with largest lesion ≤ 4.5 cm and total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm | ||
No gross vascular invasion | ||
Shanghai Fudan | Solitary tumor ≤ 9 cm in diameter or | Fan et al[168] |
≤ 3 lesions with the largest ≤ 5 cm and total tumor diameter ≤ 9 cm | ||
Hangzhou | Total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm or | Zheng et al[169] |
Total tumor diameter more than 8 cm with histopathological grade I or II and preoperative α-fetoprotein ≤ 400 ng/mL | Lee et al[170] | |
Asan | Largest tumor diameter ≤ 5 cm | |
Hepatocellular carcinoma number ≤ 6 | ||
No gross vascular invasion |
Region | Country | Basic listing | Standard exception | Patient benefit |
Eurotransplant | Germany | 1 tumor > 2 and < 5 cm up to 3 tumors > 1 and < 3 cm | Initial listing with MELD 22; upgrading every 3 mo by 10% mortality risk | |
The Netherlands | 1 tumor > 2 and < 5 cm up to 3 tumors > 1 and < 3 cm | Initial listing with MELD 20; upgrading every 3 mo by 10% mortality risk | ||
However, “test of time”: patient must have been on the waiting list for 6 mo prior | ||||
Austria | Possible (if Milan criteria are met); however, irrelevant with center-based allocation | No | ||
Europe | United Kingdom | Single lesion < 5 cm | No prioritization on the waiting list | |
Up to 5 lesions < 3 cm | ||||
Single lesion between 5 and 7 cm without progression over 6 mo | ||||
No extrahepatic tumor | ||||
No macrovascular invasion AFP < 1000 U/L | ||||
France | Complex French Liver Allocation Score under consideration of | |||
Lab-MELD-Scores | ||||
Tumor stage (T2 ranked higher than T1) | ||||
Elapsed waiting time | ||||
Distance between donor and Recipient hospital | ||||
Switzerland | 1 tumor > 2 and < 5 cm | Lab-MELD + 1.5 points per month | ||
up to 3 tumors > 1 and < 3 cm | ||||
North America | United States | 1 tumor > 2 and < 5 cm | Initial listing with MELD 22; upgrading every 3 mo by 10% mortality risk | |
up to 3 tumors > 1 and < 3 cm | ||||
South America | Brazil | 1 tumor < 5 cm | Initial listing with 20 points, increase to 24 points after 3 mo and 29 points after 6 mo | |
up to 3 tumors of less than 3 cm each |
- Citation: Fahrner R, Dondorf F, Ardelt M, Dittmar Y, Settmacher U, Rauchfuß F. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - factors influencing outcome and disease-free survival. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(42): 12071-12082
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i42/12071.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12071