Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2015; 21(38): 10898-10906
Published online Oct 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10898
Table 1 Relationship between lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and clinicopathological characteristics
VariableNo. of patientsLMR
P value
≤ 3.23 (n = 66)> 3.23 (n = 144)
Age (yr)
< 60165521130.959
≥ 60451431
Gender
Female256190.394
Male18560125
Liver cirrhosis
Absent497420.003
Present16159102
ALT (U/L)
≤ 75172511210.238
> 75381523
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)
≤ 34197571400.002
> 341394
Albumin (g/L)
< 3515780.303
≥ 3519559136
ALP (U/L)
≤ 100171511200.294
> 100391524
AFP (ng/dL)
≤ 40012438860.769
> 400862858
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5157431140.030
> 5532330
Tumor number
Single184591250.597
Multiple26719
Portal vein thrombus
Absent196611350.952
Present1459
Microvascular invasion
Absent170551150.552
Present401129
Histological differentiation
Poor228140.598
Well and Moderate18858130
ALC (× 109/L)
≤ 1.661175067< 0.001
> 1.66931677
AMC (× 109/L)
≤ 0.2957354< 0.001
> 0.291536390
Table 2 Cox proportional hazards model of prognostic factors for overall survival in 210 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)P valueHR (95%CI)P value
Age (yr), ≥ 60 vs < 600.766 (0.410-1.433)0.404
Gender, male vs female0.829 (0.296-2.321)0.721
Liver cirrhosis, yes vs no7.641 (1.853-31.509)0.0057.084 (1.694-29.614)0.007
ALT (U/L), > 75 vs ≤ 751.513 (0.771-2.970)0.229
Total bilirubin (μmol/L), > 34 vs ≤ 342.085 (0.822-5.288)0.122
Albumin (g/L), ≥ 35 vs < 350.242 (0.112-0.522)< 0.001
ALP (U/L), > 100 vs ≤ 1002.116 (1.148-3.899)0.0162.137 (1.153-3.964)0.016
AFP (ng/dL), > 400 vs ≤ 4000.956 (0.535-1.705)0.878
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.154 (1.204-3.853)0.010
Tumor number, multiple vs single1.048 (0.444-2.477)0.915
Portal vein thrombus: yes vs no3.348 (1.492-7.512)0.003
Microvascular invasion: yes vs no2.121 (1.151-3.911)0.0162.307 (1.217- 4.370)0.010
Histological differentiation, poor vs well and moderate2.888 (1.467-5.684)0.0022.375 (1.195-4.721)0.014
BCLC stage, B + C vs 0 + A2.110 (1.197-3.720)0.0102.155 (1.213-3.831)0.009
Preoperative LMR, > 3.23 vs ≤ 3.230.352 (0.199-0.623)< 0.0010.398 (0.219-0.725)0.003
Table 3 Cox proportional hazards model of prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival in 210 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)P valueHR (95%CI)P value
Age(yr), ≥ 60 vs < 601.319 (0.859-2.027)0.206
Gender, male vs female0.855 (0.458-1.594)0.621
Liver cirrhosis: yes vs no1.316 (0.831-2.086)0.242
ALT (U/L), > 75 vs ≤ 751.709 (1.096-2.665)0.0181.510 (0.960-2.375)0.074
Total bilirubin (μmol/L), > 34 vs ≤ 341.471 (0.715-3.023)0.294
Albumin (g/L), ≥ 35 vs < 350.279 (0.160-0.485)< 0.001
ALP (U/L), > 100 vs ≤ 1001.506 (0.964-2.354)0.072
AFP (ng/dL), > 400 vs ≤ 4000.934 (0.636-1.373)0.730
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.020 (1.354-3.012)0.001
Tumor number, multiple vs single1.599 (0.953-2.684)0.075
Portal vein thrombus, yes vs no2.282 (1.150-4.529)0.018
Microvascular invasion, yes vs no1.185 (0.742-1.892)0.478
Histological differentiation, poor vs well and moderate2.628 (1.561-4.425)< 0.0012.610 (1.542-4.416)< 0.001
BCLC stage, B + C vs 0 + A1.724 (1.180-2.520)0.0051.645 (1.124-2.409)0.010
Preoperative LMR, > 3.23 vs ≤ 3.230.601 (0.410-0.883)0.0090.584 (0.398-0.859)0.006