Gao Y, Zheng DY, Cui Z, Ma Y, Liu YZ, Zhang W. Predictive value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10418-10426 [PMID: 26420968 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10418]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Zheng Cui, BD, Deputy Chief Physician, Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Tongji University Affiliated East Hospital, No. 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai 200120, China. gaoyisixth@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10418-10426 Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10418
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups
Non-recurrence group (n = 37)
Recurrence group (n = 14)
χ2/t
P-value
Gender
Male
28
10
0.002
0.756
Female
9
4
Age (yr)
54.1 ± 7.7
54.3 ± 8.2
0.453
0.653
Tumor location
Left lobe of liver
6
3
0.001
0.663
Right lobe of liver
31
11
Maximum diameter of tumor (cm)
≤3
28
11
0.023
0.828
3-5
9
3
Child grade
A
34
12
0.018
0.508
B
3
2
AFP (ug/L)
> 200
6
4
0.356
0.321
≤200
31
10
Degree of tumor differentiation
High
12
4
0.672
0.437
Medium
23
9
Low
2
1
Table 2 Relationship of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters between the two groups
Parameters
Non-recurrence group (37)
Recurrence group (14)
t
P-value
tRT (s)
23.2 ± 7.0
13.6 ± 6.1
4.517
0.000
pRT (s)
20.7 ± 10.2
18.5 ± 9.9
0.693
0.492
tTTP (s)
59.6 ± 14.2
41.2 ± 10.2
4.423
0.000
pTTP (s)
66.4 ± 17.3
56.8 ± 13.2
1.876
0.067
tPI (%)
31.4 ± 6.4
23.8 ± 6.7
3.737
0.000
p-tTTP (s)
-6.3 ± 10.7
-12.3 ± 10.2
1.809
0.077
t-pPI (%)
14.6 ± 7.4
7.1 ± 3.4
3.632
0.000
Table 3 Correlation analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters and expression levels of endothelin-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor
Parameters
ET-1
bFGF
r
P-value
r
P-value
tRT
0.211
0.302
-0.317
0.143
tTTP
0.133
0.570
-0.312
0.037
pTTP
0.132
0.671
-0.344
0.214
tPI
-0.412
0.293
-0.063
0.715
p-tTTP
-0.005
0.913
-0.075
0.702
Table 4 Multiple factor analysis of the relationship between contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters, expression levels of endothelin-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation
Parameters
β
SE
Wald
P-value
OR
95%CI
Lower limit
Upper limit
Low level of tRT
-0.207
0.062
5.326
0.037
0.813
0.720
0.918
Low level of tPI
-0.076
0.007
7.392
0.006
0.927
0.914
0.940
Low level of tTTP
-0.312
0.008
5.892
0.019
0.732
0.721
0.744
High level of bFGF
0.071
0.029
4.872
0.011
1.074
1.015
1.137
Low level of pRT
-0.091
0.091
5.322
0.137
0.913
0.764
1.091
Low level of pTTP
-0.057
0.032
4.352
0.086
0.945
0.888
1.006
Low level of t-pTTP
-0.066
0.042
4.892
0.136
0.936
0.862
1.016
Low level of t-pPI
-0.013
0.032
3.842
0.187
0.987
0.927
1.051
High level of ET-1
0.031
0.032
5.762
0.879
1.032
0.969
1.099
Citation: Gao Y, Zheng DY, Cui Z, Ma Y, Liu YZ, Zhang W. Predictive value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10418-10426