Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10418-10426
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10418
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10418
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups
Non-recurrence group (n = 37) | Recurrence group (n = 14) | χ2/t | P-value | |
Gender | ||||
Male | 28 | 10 | 0.002 | 0.756 |
Female | 9 | 4 | ||
Age (yr) | 54.1 ± 7.7 | 54.3 ± 8.2 | 0.453 | 0.653 |
Tumor location | ||||
Left lobe of liver | 6 | 3 | 0.001 | 0.663 |
Right lobe of liver | 31 | 11 | ||
Maximum diameter of tumor (cm) | ||||
≤3 | 28 | 11 | 0.023 | 0.828 |
3-5 | 9 | 3 | ||
Child grade | ||||
A | 34 | 12 | 0.018 | 0.508 |
B | 3 | 2 | ||
AFP (ug/L) | ||||
> 200 | 6 | 4 | 0.356 | 0.321 |
≤200 | 31 | 10 | ||
Degree of tumor differentiation | ||||
High | 12 | 4 | 0.672 | 0.437 |
Medium | 23 | 9 | ||
Low | 2 | 1 |
Table 2 Relationship of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters between the two groups
Parameters | Non-recurrence group (37) | Recurrence group (14) | t | P-value |
tRT (s) | 23.2 ± 7.0 | 13.6 ± 6.1 | 4.517 | 0.000 |
pRT (s) | 20.7 ± 10.2 | 18.5 ± 9.9 | 0.693 | 0.492 |
tTTP (s) | 59.6 ± 14.2 | 41.2 ± 10.2 | 4.423 | 0.000 |
pTTP (s) | 66.4 ± 17.3 | 56.8 ± 13.2 | 1.876 | 0.067 |
tPI (%) | 31.4 ± 6.4 | 23.8 ± 6.7 | 3.737 | 0.000 |
p-tTTP (s) | -6.3 ± 10.7 | -12.3 ± 10.2 | 1.809 | 0.077 |
t-pPI (%) | 14.6 ± 7.4 | 7.1 ± 3.4 | 3.632 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters and expression levels of endothelin-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor
Parameters | ET-1 | bFGF | ||
r | P-value | r | P-value | |
tRT | 0.211 | 0.302 | -0.317 | 0.143 |
tTTP | 0.133 | 0.570 | -0.312 | 0.037 |
pTTP | 0.132 | 0.671 | -0.344 | 0.214 |
tPI | -0.412 | 0.293 | -0.063 | 0.715 |
p-tTTP | -0.005 | 0.913 | -0.075 | 0.702 |
Table 4 Multiple factor analysis of the relationship between contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters, expression levels of endothelin-1 and basic fibroblast growth factor, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation
Parameters | β | SE | Wald | P-value | OR | 95%CI | |
Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||
Low level of tRT | -0.207 | 0.062 | 5.326 | 0.037 | 0.813 | 0.720 | 0.918 |
Low level of tPI | -0.076 | 0.007 | 7.392 | 0.006 | 0.927 | 0.914 | 0.940 |
Low level of tTTP | -0.312 | 0.008 | 5.892 | 0.019 | 0.732 | 0.721 | 0.744 |
High level of bFGF | 0.071 | 0.029 | 4.872 | 0.011 | 1.074 | 1.015 | 1.137 |
Low level of pRT | -0.091 | 0.091 | 5.322 | 0.137 | 0.913 | 0.764 | 1.091 |
Low level of pTTP | -0.057 | 0.032 | 4.352 | 0.086 | 0.945 | 0.888 | 1.006 |
Low level of t-pTTP | -0.066 | 0.042 | 4.892 | 0.136 | 0.936 | 0.862 | 1.016 |
Low level of t-pPI | -0.013 | 0.032 | 3.842 | 0.187 | 0.987 | 0.927 | 1.051 |
High level of ET-1 | 0.031 | 0.032 | 5.762 | 0.879 | 1.032 | 0.969 | 1.099 |
- Citation: Gao Y, Zheng DY, Cui Z, Ma Y, Liu YZ, Zhang W. Predictive value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after ablation. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(36): 10418-10426
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i36/10418.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10418