Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6280-6286
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6280
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6280
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between high- and low-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte groups n (%)
| Clinicopathological feature | n | High-NLR group | Low-NLR group | χ2 | P value |
| Gender | 0.163 | 0.686 | |||
| Male | 210 | 93 (44.3) | 117 (55.7) | ||
| Female | 81 | 38 (46.9) | 43 (53.1) | ||
| Age | 12.377 | 0.000 | |||
| < 65 yr | 142 | 49 (34.5) | 93 (65.5) | ||
| ≥ 65 yr | 149 | 82 (55.0) | 67 (45.0) | ||
| Tumor size | 20.852 | 0.000 | |||
| < 5 cm | 143 | 45 (31.5) | 98 (68.5) | ||
| ≥ 5 cm | 148 | 86 (58.1) | 62 (41.9) | ||
| Differentiation degree | |||||
| Middle and high differentiation | 130 | 59 (45.4) | 71 (54.6) | 0.013 | 0.910 |
| Low differentiation | 161 | 72 (44.7) | 89 (55.3) | ||
| T staging | |||||
| T1 | 20 | 2 (10.0) | 18 (90.0) | 20.731 | 0.000 |
| T2 | 29 | 13 (41.4) | 16 (58.6) | ||
| T3 | 177 | 74 (41.8) | 103 (58.2) | ||
| T4 | 65 | 42 (64.6) | 23 (35.4) | ||
| N staging | 4.185 | 0.242 | |||
| N0 | 55 | 18 (32.7) | 37 (67.3) | ||
| N1 | 127 | 60 (47.2) | 67 (52.8) | ||
| N2 | 78 | 38 (48.7) | 40 (51.3) | ||
| N3 | 31 | 15 (48.4) | 16 (51.6) | ||
| TNM staging | 11.363 | 0.003 | |||
| Stage I | 32 | 8 (25.0) | 24 (75.0) | ||
| Stage II | 123 | 49 (39.8) | 74 (60.2) | ||
| Stage III | 136 | 74 (54.4) | 62 (45.6) | ||
| platelet counting | 9.672 | 0.002 | |||
| < 300 × 109/L | 253 | 105 (41.5) | 148 (58.5) | ||
| ≥ 300 × 109/L | 38 | 26 (68.4) | 12 (31.6) | ||
| CEA | 2.972 | 0.085 | |||
| < 5 ng/mL | 178 | 73 (41.0) | 105 (59.0) | ||
| ≥ 5 ng/mL | 113 | 58 (51.3) | 55 (48.7) |
Table 2 Multivariate analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio-associated risk factors
| Clinicopathological feature | HR | 95%CI | P value |
| Gender (M/F) | 1.219 | 0.693-2.146 | 0.492 |
| Age (yr) | 1.036 | 1.014-1.059 | 0.002 |
| Tumor size | 2.690 | 1.584-4.565 | 0.000 |
| Differentiation degree | 0.966 | 0.575-1.622 | 0.895 |
| T staging | 1.269 | 0.705-2.287 | 0.427 |
| N staging | 0.743 | 0.453-1.219 | 0.239 |
| TNM staging | 1.732 | 0.680-4.409 | 0.249 |
| Platelet counting | 0.999 | 0.996-1.002 | 0.395 |
| CEA | 1.001 | 0.998-1.003 | 0.630 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate survival analysis results
| Clinicopathological feature | Univariate-analyzed P value | Multivariate analysis | |
| P value | HR (95%CI) | ||
| Gender | 0.611 | ||
| Male | |||
| Female | |||
| Age | 0.000 | 0.096 | |
| < 65 yr | 0.774 (0.573-1.046) | ||
| ≥ 65 yr | 1.000 | ||
| Tumor size | 0.000 | 0.122 | |
| < 5 cm | 0.784 (0.576-1.067) | ||
| ≥ 5 cm | 1.000 | ||
| Differentiation degree | 0.108 | ||
| Middle and high differentiation | |||
| Low differentiation | |||
| T staging | 0.000 | 0.583 | |
| T1 | 0.898 | 0.879 (0.122-6.338) | |
| T2 | 0.579 | 0.797 (0.358-1.776) | |
| T3 | 0.170 | 0.739 (0.480-1.138) | |
| T4 | 1.000 | ||
| N staging | 0.000 | 0.080 | |
| N0 | 0.303 | 0.622 (0.252-1.535) | |
| N1 | 0.910 | 1.037 (0.556-1.934) | |
| N2 | 0.091 | 0.678 (0.433-1.063) | |
| N3 | 1.000 | ||
| TNM staging | 0.000 | 0.008 | |
| Stage I | 0.030 | 0.134 (0.022-0.822) | |
| Stage II | 0.004 | 0.387 (0.204-0.735) | |
| Stage III | 1.000 | ||
| Platelet counting | 0.382 | ||
| < 300 × 109/L | |||
| ≥ 300 × 109/L | |||
| CEA | 0.000 | 0.547 | |
| < 5 ng/mL | 0.912 (0.675-1.231) | ||
| ≥ 5 ng/mL | 1.000 | ||
| NLR | 0.000 | 0.003 | |
| < 3.5 | 0.626 (0.460-0.852) | ||
| ≥ 3.5 | 1.000 | ||
- Citation: Yu L, Lv CY, Yuan AH, Chen W, Wu AW. Significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(20): 6280-6286
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i20/6280.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6280
