Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: Retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.593

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (12899)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-4) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

565

WORD

260

HTML

8593

Figures (1-4)

600

Tables (1-1)

508

Sum=10526

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1108

Download

1265

Sum=2373

Jan 14, 2015 (publication date) through Oct 30, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (7)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Clinical Trials Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2015; 21(2): 593-599
Published online Jan 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.593

Table 1 Cumulative polyp detection rates by colonoscope and withdrawal method n (%)

	A	B	C	D	P values
	Conventional colonoscope, Standard Withdrawal	RetroView™ colonoscope, Standard Withdrawal	RetroView™ colonoscope, Retroflexed Withdrawal	RetroView™ colonoscope, Combination Withdrawal (Standard + Retroflexed)	P values
Hidden polyps	7 (12)	11 (18)	51 (85)	56 (93)	A vs B, P = 0.5
(n = 60)					A vs C, P < 0.0001
(n = 60)					A vs D, P < 0.0001
Obvious polyps	21 (84)	19 (76)	16 (64)	24 (96)	A vs B, P = 0.4
(n =25)					A vs C, P = 0.7
					A vs D, P < 0.0001
					C vs D, P = 0.01
All polyps	28 (32)	30 (35)	67 (79)	80 (94)	A vs C, P < 0.001
(n =85)					A vs D, P < 0.0001
(n =85)					C vs D, P < 0.01

Full Size Table

Citation: McGill SK, Kothari S, Friedland S, Chen A, Park WG, Banerjee S. Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: Retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(2): 593-599
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i2/593.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.593