Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2015; 21(13): 3928-3935
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3928
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population (n = 1255)
Non-cirrhotic CHB (n = 879)Cirrhosis without HCC (n = 219)HCC (n = 157)P value
Age (yr)45 (17-97)54 (26-92)57 (34-89)0.0001
Gender (M:F)549:330151:68124:330.0001
AFP (ng/mL)2.5 (0.6-602.8)3.3 (0.6-233.6)55.9 (0.6-121000.0)0.0001
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)23 (6-162)19 (4-312)202 (10-2000)0.0001
INR1.00 (0.84-3.24)1.11 (0.92-2.38)1.12 (0.79-8.93)0.0001
Albumin (g/dL)4.5 (2.3-5.3)4.2 (0.5-5.2)3.6 (2.0-5.2)0.0001
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.7 (0.2-19.2)0.9 (0.2-18.9)1.0 (0.3-14.7)0.0001
ALT (IU/L)26.5 (2-3112)31 (8-886)39 (6-1155)0.1220
MELD score7.110.19.90.0001
TNM stage n (%)NANA
I22 (14.0)
II58 (36.9)
III32 (20.4)
IV45 (28.7)
Early HCC n (%)NANA46 (29.3)
Table 2 Comparision of baseline characteristics according to cutoff values of prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II (40 mAU/mL) and AFP (10 ng/mL)
PIVKA-II < 40 AFP < 10PIVKA-II40 AFP < 10PIVKA-II < 40 AFP < 10PIVKA-II40 AFP10P value
Number918125108104
Age (yr)47.9 (17-97)48.4 (18-83)51.4 (23-92)55 (25-88)0.0001
Gender (M:F)578:34097:2867:4182:220.0001
INR1.0 (0.8-3.2)1.0 (0.8-2.3)1.1 (0.9-2.1)1.13 (0.7-8.9)0.0001
Albumin (g/dL)4.5 (0.5-5.3)2.9 (0.6-9.6)3.8 (2-5.2)3.5 (1.7-4.9)0.0001
TB (mg/dL)0.7 (0.2-18.9)0.7 (0.2-19.2)1.1 (0.2-17.3)1.1 (0.3-14.7)0.0001
ALT (IU/L)25.4 (2-803)30.1 (5-1664)50 (9-1531)43.4 (9-3112)0.0001
MELD score7.48.29.910.50.0001
LC, n (%)188 (20.5)42 (33.6)50 (46.3)89 (85.6)0.0001
HCC, n (%)21 (2.3)30 (24)20 (18.5)86 (82.7)0.0001
Table 3 Sensitivity and specificity of alpha-fetoprotein and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence-II in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from nonmalignant chronic hepatitis B
SensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)
> 40
HCC vs CHB73.9%89.7%50.7%96.0%
HCC vs LC73.9%90.4%84.7%82.8%
> 100
HCC vs CHB57.3%98.8%87.4%94.2%
HCC vs LC57.3%96.8%82.8%76.0%
> 125
HCC vs CHB56.1%99.2%90.7%94.0%
HCC vs LC56.1%97.3%93.6%75.5%
> 150
HCC vs CHB52.9%99.4%92.2%93.6%
HCC vs LC52.9%97.3%93.3%74.2%
AFP (ng/mL)
> 10
HCC vs CHB67.5%90.3%50.0%95.1%
HCC vs LC67.5%82.6%73.6%78.0%
> 20
HCC vs CHB59.9%94.4%60.3%94.3%
HCC vs LC59.9%90.0%81.0%75.8%
> 200
HCC vs CHB36.3%99.3%87.7%91.6%
HCC vs LC36.3%99.1%96.6%68.5%
> 400
HCC vs CHB29.9%99.7%94.0%90.9%
HCC vs LC29.9%100.0%100.0%66.6%
Combination1
HCC vs CHB75.2%95.4%69.8%96.4%
HCC vs LC75.2%92.7%88.1%83.9%