Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2015; 21(13): 3826-3842
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3826
Published online Apr 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3826
Table 1 Expanded criteria for liver transplantation proposed in Eastern countries
| Criteria (city, country, reference) | Tumor number | Tumor diameter (cm) | Additional criteria | Overall survivalwithin criteria | |
| Hong Kong, China[20] | 1 | ≤ 6.5 | No diffuse type, | 3 yr | 78% |
| ≤ 3 | ≤ 4.5 | no vascular invasion | 5 yr | 66% | |
| Hangzhou, China[21] | NC | Total ≤ 8 | Histopathologic grade I or II with AFP ≤ 400 ng/dL if tumor > 8 cm | 3 yr | 70.7% |
| 5 yr | 70.7% | ||||
| Seoul (AMC), Korea[22] | ≤ 6 | ≤ 5 | No gross vascular invasion | 3 yr | 87.5% |
| 5 yr | 81.6% | ||||
| Seoul (CMC), Korea[23] | ≤ 7 | ≤ 7 | NC | 5 yr | 86.3% |
| Tokyo, Japan[24] | ≤ 5 | ≤ 5 | NC | 3 yr | 82% |
| 5 yr | 75% | ||||
| Kyoto, Japan[25] | ≤ 10 | ≤ 5 | PIVKA-II ≤ 400 mAU/mL | 5 yr | 87% |
Table 2 Randomized controlled trials with molecular target therapies[92]
| Status | |
| First line | |
| Comparison with placebo | |
| Sorafenib (SHARP, Asian-Pacific) | Proven benefit |
| Sorafenib in Child B (BOOST) | Phase III Ongoing |
| Comparison study between sorafenib and single agent (head to head) | |
| Sunitinib -> endpoint not met | Terminated |
| Brivanib (BRISK-FL) -> endpoint not met | Failed |
| Linifanib -> endpoint not met | Terminated |
| Lenvatinib | Phase III ongoing |
| Combination of sorafenib and another agent | |
| Sorafenib + Erlotinib (SEARCH) -> endpoint not met | Failed |
| Sorafenib + Doxorubicin (CALGB-80802) | Phase III ongoing |
| Sorafenib + Everolimus | R-Phase II; Failed |
| Second line | |
| Sorafenib failure | |
| Brivanib (BRISK-PS) -> endpoint not met | Failed |
| Brivanib (BRISK-APS) | Terminated |
| Everolimus (EVOLVE-1) -> endpoint not met | Failed |
| Ramucirumab (REACH) | Phase III ongoing |
| Regorafenib (RESORCE) | Phase III ongoing |
| Cabozantinib (CELESTAL) | Phase III ongoing |
| Tivantinib (Metiv-HCC) | Phase III ongoing |
| Combination or addition to standard therapies | |
| Adjuvant setting after surgery or RFA: Sorafenib (STORM) | |
| Failed | |
| Combination with TACE: Sorafenib (SPACE) -> endpoint not met | |
| Failed | |
| Brivanib (BRISK-TA) -> endpoint not met | Failed |
| Sorafenib (TACTICS) | R-Phase II ongoing |
- Citation: Yim HJ, Suh SJ, Um SH. Current management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An Eastern perspective. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(13): 3826-3842
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i13/3826.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3826
