Huang ZP, Zhang XL, Zeng J, Zheng J, Wang P, Zheng RQ. Study of detection times for liver stiffness evaluation by shear wave elastography. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9578-9584 [PMID: 25071355 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Rong-Qin Zheng, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China. zhengrongqin@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9578-9584 Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578
Table 1 Comparison of liver stiffness values obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B at different pathological stages
Stage
n
1 VM (kPa)
2 VMs (kPa)
3 VMs (kPa)
5 VMs (kPa)
10 VMs (kPa)
F
P
F0
13
6.95 ± 2.01
6.87 ± 1.83
6.90 ± 1.88
6.95 ± 1.93
7.15 ± 1.89
0.043
0.996
F1
33
7.12 ± 1.72
7.24 ± 1.72
7.21 ± 1.74
7.10 ± 1.78
7.04 ± 1.70
0.075
0.99
F2
24
9.37 ± 3.87
9.18 ± 3.68
9.19 ± 3.81
9.18 ± 3.81
9.19 ± 3.53
0.012
1
F3
21
11.91 ± 3.88
11.78 ± 4.04
11.83 ± 4.07
11.94 ± 4.17
12.00 ± 4.02
0.01
1
F4
21
19.30 ± 7.63
19.40 ± 7.36
19.54 ± 7.43
19.73 ± 7.21
20.25 ± 7.22
0.054
0.995
Table 2 Correlation between liver stiffness values obtained from different valid measurements at different pathological stages
Stage
n
ICC
95%CI
F0
13
0.995
0.988-0.998
F1
33
0.993
0.988-0.996
F2
24
0.996
0.993-0.998
F3
21
0.994
0.989-0.997
F4
21
0.996
0.992-0.998
Overall
112
0.998
0.997-0.998
Table 3 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the elastic modulus of the liver obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography at different pathological stages
Stage
1 VM
2 VMs
3 VMs
5 VMs
All 10 VMs
ROC
95%CI
ROC
95%CI
ROC
95%CI
ROC
95%CI
ROC
95%CI
F0-1234
0.772 (0.683-0.846)
0.782 (0.694-0.854)
0.775 (0.687-0.849)
0.763 (0.674-0.839)
0.740 (0.649-0.818)
F01-234
0.862 (0.784-0.920)
0.855 (0.775-0.914)
0.852 (0.772-0.912)
0.858 (0.779-0.916)
0.866 (0.789-0.923)
F012-34
0.896 (0.824-0.945)
0.899 (0.827-0.948)
0.902 (0.831-0.950)
0.907 (0.838-0.954)
0.909 (0.840-0.955)
F0123-4
0.919 (0.852-0.962)
0.929 (0.865-0.969)
0.934 (0.871-0.972)
0.941 (0.880-0.977)
0.949 (0.891-0.982)
Table 4 Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the elastic modulus of the liver obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography at different pathological stages
Different VMs
F0-1234
F01-234
F012-34
F0123-4
Difference
P
Difference
P
Difference
P
Difference
P
1 VM vs 2 VMs
0.001
0.618
0.008
0.323
0.003
0.703
0.010
0.267
1 VM vs 3 VMs
0.003
0.917
0.011
0.321
0.006
0.57
0.015
0.171
1 VM vs 5 VMs
0.009
0.800
0.005
0.682
0.012
0.297
0.022
0.068
1 VM vs 10 VMs
0.032
0.365
0.004
0.787
0.013
0.379
0.030
0.089
2 VMs vs 3 VMs
0.006
0.785
0.003
0.617
0.003
0.595
0.004
0.477
2 VMs vs 5 VMs
0.018
0.420
0.003
0.704
0.009
0.208
0.012
0.152
2 VMs vs 10 VMs
0.042
0.152
0.012
0.415
0.010
0.475
0.020
0.212
3 VMs vs 5 VMs
0.012
0.487
0.006
0.227
0.005
0.208
0.007
0.152
3 VMs vs 10 VMs
0.035
0.073
0.015
0.245
0.007
0.609
0.015
0.302
5 VMs vs 10 VMs
0.023
0.451
0.009
0.461
0.002
0.900
0.008
0.538
Citation: Huang ZP, Zhang XL, Zeng J, Zheng J, Wang P, Zheng RQ. Study of detection times for liver stiffness evaluation by shear wave elastography. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9578-9584