Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9578-9584
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578
Table 1 Comparison of liver stiffness values obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B at different pathological stages
| Stage | n | 1 VM (kPa) | 2 VMs (kPa) | 3 VMs (kPa) | 5 VMs (kPa) | 10 VMs (kPa) | F | P |
| F0 | 13 | 6.95 ± 2.01 | 6.87 ± 1.83 | 6.90 ± 1.88 | 6.95 ± 1.93 | 7.15 ± 1.89 | 0.043 | 0.996 |
| F1 | 33 | 7.12 ± 1.72 | 7.24 ± 1.72 | 7.21 ± 1.74 | 7.10 ± 1.78 | 7.04 ± 1.70 | 0.075 | 0.99 |
| F2 | 24 | 9.37 ± 3.87 | 9.18 ± 3.68 | 9.19 ± 3.81 | 9.18 ± 3.81 | 9.19 ± 3.53 | 0.012 | 1 |
| F3 | 21 | 11.91 ± 3.88 | 11.78 ± 4.04 | 11.83 ± 4.07 | 11.94 ± 4.17 | 12.00 ± 4.02 | 0.01 | 1 |
| F4 | 21 | 19.30 ± 7.63 | 19.40 ± 7.36 | 19.54 ± 7.43 | 19.73 ± 7.21 | 20.25 ± 7.22 | 0.054 | 0.995 |
Table 2 Correlation between liver stiffness values obtained from different valid measurements at different pathological stages
| Stage | n | ICC | 95%CI |
| F0 | 13 | 0.995 | 0.988-0.998 |
| F1 | 33 | 0.993 | 0.988-0.996 |
| F2 | 24 | 0.996 | 0.993-0.998 |
| F3 | 21 | 0.994 | 0.989-0.997 |
| F4 | 21 | 0.996 | 0.992-0.998 |
| Overall | 112 | 0.998 | 0.997-0.998 |
Table 3 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the elastic modulus of the liver obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography at different pathological stages
| Stage | 1 VM | 2 VMs | 3 VMs | 5 VMs | All 10 VMs | |||||
| ROC | 95%CI | ROC | 95%CI | ROC | 95%CI | ROC | 95%CI | ROC | 95%CI | |
| F0-1234 | 0.772 (0.683-0.846) | 0.782 (0.694-0.854) | 0.775 (0.687-0.849) | 0.763 (0.674-0.839) | 0.740 (0.649-0.818) | |||||
| F01-234 | 0.862 (0.784-0.920) | 0.855 (0.775-0.914) | 0.852 (0.772-0.912) | 0.858 (0.779-0.916) | 0.866 (0.789-0.923) | |||||
| F012-34 | 0.896 (0.824-0.945) | 0.899 (0.827-0.948) | 0.902 (0.831-0.950) | 0.907 (0.838-0.954) | 0.909 (0.840-0.955) | |||||
| F0123-4 | 0.919 (0.852-0.962) | 0.929 (0.865-0.969) | 0.934 (0.871-0.972) | 0.941 (0.880-0.977) | 0.949 (0.891-0.982) | |||||
Table 4 Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the elastic modulus of the liver obtained from different valid measurements of shear wave elastography at different pathological stages
| Different VMs | F0-1234 | F01-234 | F012-34 | F0123-4 | ||||
| Difference | P | Difference | P | Difference | P | Difference | P | |
| 1 VM vs 2 VMs | 0.001 | 0.618 | 0.008 | 0.323 | 0.003 | 0.703 | 0.010 | 0.267 |
| 1 VM vs 3 VMs | 0.003 | 0.917 | 0.011 | 0.321 | 0.006 | 0.57 | 0.015 | 0.171 |
| 1 VM vs 5 VMs | 0.009 | 0.800 | 0.005 | 0.682 | 0.012 | 0.297 | 0.022 | 0.068 |
| 1 VM vs 10 VMs | 0.032 | 0.365 | 0.004 | 0.787 | 0.013 | 0.379 | 0.030 | 0.089 |
| 2 VMs vs 3 VMs | 0.006 | 0.785 | 0.003 | 0.617 | 0.003 | 0.595 | 0.004 | 0.477 |
| 2 VMs vs 5 VMs | 0.018 | 0.420 | 0.003 | 0.704 | 0.009 | 0.208 | 0.012 | 0.152 |
| 2 VMs vs 10 VMs | 0.042 | 0.152 | 0.012 | 0.415 | 0.010 | 0.475 | 0.020 | 0.212 |
| 3 VMs vs 5 VMs | 0.012 | 0.487 | 0.006 | 0.227 | 0.005 | 0.208 | 0.007 | 0.152 |
| 3 VMs vs 10 VMs | 0.035 | 0.073 | 0.015 | 0.245 | 0.007 | 0.609 | 0.015 | 0.302 |
| 5 VMs vs 10 VMs | 0.023 | 0.451 | 0.009 | 0.461 | 0.002 | 0.900 | 0.008 | 0.538 |
- Citation: Huang ZP, Zhang XL, Zeng J, Zheng J, Wang P, Zheng RQ. Study of detection times for liver stiffness evaluation by shear wave elastography. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9578-9584
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i28/9578.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9578
