Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2014; 20(16): 4787-4796
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4787
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4787
Table 1 Main clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with chronic viral hepatitis n (%)
Characteristics | All patients(n = 134) | Patients with chronic hepatitis C (n = 102) |
Sex, females | 29 (23.4) | 20 (21.3) |
Age, yr (SD) | 43.70 (11.4) | 45.2 (11.0) |
BMI, kg/m2 (SD) | 25.1 (4.5) | 25.2 (4.9) |
AST, IU/L (IQR) | 46 (26-78) | 46 (30-83) |
ALT, IU/L (IQR) | 69 (41-122) | 70 (43-127) |
Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L (IQR) | 69 (59-87) | 70 (59-95) |
GGT, IU/L (IQR) | 49 (26-80) | 50 (36-88) |
Total bilirubin, M/L (IQR) | 0.62 (0.46-0.94) | 0.60 (0.44-0.89) |
Platelet count, 103/mm3 (SD) | 227.8 (76.0) | 227.7 (70.1) |
Prothrombin time, % (SD) | 94.0 (15.5) | 94.4 (17.0) |
HCV infection | 102 (76.1) | - |
HBV infection | 28 (20.9) | - |
Other1 | 4 (3.0) | - |
Fibrosis score (METAVIR)2 | ||
F0 | 14 (10.5) | 6 (5.9) |
F1 | 56 (42.1) | 44 (43.6) |
F2 | 29 (21.8) | 24 (23.8) |
F3 | 20 (15.0) | 17 (16.8) |
F4 | 14 (10.5) | 10 (9.9) |
Activity grade (METAVIR) | ||
A0 | 12 (9.0) | 5 (4.9) |
A1 | 77 (58.0) | 57 (56.4) |
A2 | 28 (21.0) | 27 (26.7) |
A3 | 16 (12.0) | 12 (11.9) |
Steatosis grade | ||
S0 | 83 (62.4) | 62 (61.3) |
S1 | 30 (22.6) | 23 (22.8) |
S2 | 16 (12.0) | 12 (11.9) |
S3 | 4 (3.0) | 4 (4.0) |
LSM, kPa (IQR) | 6.6 (5.0-8.9) | 6.5 (5.0-8.9) |
PSWE, kPa (IQR) | 5.3 (3.9-6.6) | 5.2 (3.9-6.6) |
Table 2 Performance of point shear wave elastography (n = 98) and transient elastography (n = 101) in patients with chronic hepatitis C
Parameter | Method | F≥2 | F≥3 | F= 4 |
Cut-off in kPa | PSWE | 5.7 | 5.8 | 7.2 |
TE | 6.9 | 7.3 | 9.3 | |
AUC | PSWE | 0.80 (0.71-0.87) | 0.88 (0.80-0.94) | 0.95 (0.89-0.99) |
TE | 0.82 (0.73-0.89) | 0.95 (0.88-0.98) | 0.92 (0.85-0.97) | |
Sensitivity % | PSWE | 62.0 (47.2-75.3) | 85.2 (66.3-95.8) | 90.0 (55.5-99.7) |
TE | 62.7 (48.1-75.9) | 89.9 (70.8-97.6) | 90.0 (55.5-99.7) | |
Specificity % | PSWE | 91.7 (80.0-97.7) | 84.5 (74.0-92.0) | 88.6 (80.1-94.4) |
TE | 83.7 (70.3-92.7) | 80.8 (69.9-89.1) | 87.8 (79.2-93.7) | |
PPV % | PSWE | 88.6 (73.3-96.8) | 67.6 (49.5-82.6) | 47.4 (24.4-71.1) |
TE | 80.0 (64.1-91.1) | 63.2 (45.7-78.4) | 45.0 (23.1-78.5) | |
NPV % | PSWE | 69.8 (57.0-80.8) | 93.7 (84.7-98.3) | 98.7 (93.1-100) |
TE | 68.3 (55.0-79.7) | 95.2 (86.5-99.0) | 98.7 (93.2-100) | |
+LR | PSWE | 7.4 (2.8-19.5) | 5.5 (3.1-9.7) | 7.9 (4.3-14.7) |
TE | 3.8 (2.0-7.5) | 4.6 (2.8-7.6) | 7.4 (4.1-13.3) | |
-LR | PSWE | 0.4 (0.3-0.6) | 0.2 (0.07-0.4) | 0.1 (0.02-0.7) |
TE | 0.4 (0.3-0.6) | 0.1 (0.05-0.4) | 0.1 (0.02-0.7) |
Table 3 Characteristics of the subjects assessed to determine the reproducibility of point shear wave elastography measurements
Characteristic | Total | Group 1 | Group 2 |
n = 116 | n = 47 | n = 69 | |
Sex, females (%) | 44 (37.9) | 10 (21.3)b | 34 (49.3) |
Age, yr (SD) | 41.9 (13.5) | 44.1 (12.5)a | 38.9 (13.8) |
BMI, kg/m2 (SD) | 23.2 (4.1) | 23.7 (2.7) | 23.0 (4.9) |
PSWE measurement, rater 1 (IQR) | 3.95 (3.3-5.2) | 5.34 (4.1-7.3)b | 3.53 (3.2-4.1) |
PSWE measurement, rater 2 (IQR) | 3.92 (3.3-5.2) | 5.34 (4.1-7.1)b | 3.52 (3.1-4.0) |
Table 4 Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of point shear wave elastography measurements performed by two raters
Measurements | Rater 1 | Rater 2 | Rater 1 vs Rater 2 |
CCC (95%CI) | CCC (95%CI) | CCC (95%CI) | |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 vs 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | - |
1, 3, 5, 7, 9 vs 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 | 0.95 (0.93-0.96) | 0.96 (0.94-0.97) | - |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | - | - | 0.91 (0.88-0.94) |
6, 7, 8, 9, 10 | - | - | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) |
1, 3, 5, 7, 9 | - | - | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) |
2, 4, 6, 8, 10 | - | - | 0.92 (0.90-0.94) |
All | - | - | 0.93 (0.90-0.95) |
1 vs 5 | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) | 0.85 (0.80-0.90) | - |
5 vs 10 | 0.83 (0.79-0.88) | 0.88 (0.84-0.92) | - |
2 vs 5 | 0.87 (0.84-0.91) | 0.84 (0.79-0.89) | - |
3 vs 8 | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) | 0.84 (0.79-0.88) | - |
1 | - | - | 0.89 (0.85-0.93) |
2 | - | - | 0.83 (0.78-0.88) |
5 | - | - | 0.85 (0.80-0.90) |
8 | - | - | 0.84 (0.79-0.90) |
- Citation: Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, Zicchetti M, Bello BD, Filice G, Filice C. Point shear wave elastography method for assessing liver stiffness. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(16): 4787-4796
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i16/4787.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4787