Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H. Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(9): 1424-1437 [PMID: 23539431 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1424]
Corresponding Author of This Article
George Sgourakis, MD, PhD, FACS, 2nd Surgical Department and Surgical Oncology Unit of “Korgialenio-Benakio”, Red Cross Hospital of Athens, 11 Mantzarou Street, Neo Psychiko, 11526 Athens, Greece. ggsgourakis@yahoo.gr
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Meta-regression analysis of the outcomes of endoscopic resection according to the histologic type of early esophageal cancer (the random effects model was used)
Outcome
Histologic type
Log-odds ratio
SE
95.0% lower confidence limit
95.0% upper confidence limit
Odds
Favors
Patients submitted to surgery
ADC
-2.1206
0.6249
-3.3454
-0.8958
12%
ADC
SCC
4.1356
0.4038
-4.9271
-3.3440
37%
P < 0.05
Positive margins
ADC
-2.3761
1.0181
-4.3716
-0.3806
9%
None
SCC
-2.5689
0.6973
-3.9357
-1.2022
7%
Local recurrence
ADC
-4.8189
0.1469
-5.1068
-4.5309
0.80%
None
SCC
-4.3347
0.2792
-4.8819
-3.7874
1%
Lymph node metastasis
ADC
-3.0565
0.7714
-4.5685
-1.5445
5%
None
SCC
-4.7682
0.4413
-5.6332
-3.9032
0.90%
Metachronous cancer
ADC
-2.8017
0.2384
-3.2690
-2.3344
6%
None
SCC
-4.6030
0.6059
-5.7905
-3.4155
1%
Pre- vs post-endoscopic tumor stage
ADC
-0.5449
0.4316
-1.3909
0.3011
53%
-
SCC
-0.8267
0.3324
-1.4782
-0.1752
39%
Table 4 Thirty-eight studies were included in the analysis of surgically resected patients
Table 5 Meta-regression analysis of histologic parameters between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients according to the published studies (the random effects model was used)
Comparison of ADC vs SCC
Coefficient
95%CI
P value
Better status
Positive lymph nodes
1.890
0.3945146, 3.384624
< 0.01
ADC
Lymphovascular invasion
0.626
-0.7032339, 1.956155
0.340
None
Microvascular invasion
1.114
-0.2682334, 2.496538
0.108
None
Grade 3
0.305
-1.584654, 2.195142
0.731
None
Table 6 Number of patients with lymph node metastasis and lymphatic and vascular invasion according to the depth of tumor in the submucosal layer
Citation: Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H. Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(9): 1424-1437