Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2013; 19(43): 7552-7560
Published online Nov 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7552
Published online Nov 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7552
Table 1 Association between the definitions of remission and mucosal healing and actual healing rates in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalazine
| Author | Design | Study | Timing of endoscopy | Endoscopic index | Def. of MH | No of pat. Achieving MH |
| Vecchi (2001) | Mc, RCT | Mesalazine 4 g orally vs 2 + 2 g orally and enema | 6 wk | Rachmilewitz | Rachmilewitz < 4 | 58% vs 71% |
| Malchow (2002) | Mc, db, RCT | Mesalazine 4 g enema vs 1 g foam | 4 wk | Rachmilewitz | Rachmilewitz < 2 | 38% vs 37% |
| Mansfield (2002) | Mc, db, RCT | Balsalazide 6.75 g vs sulfasal. 3g | 8 wk | 4 point scale | Score of 0 = normal mucosa | 27% vs 25% |
| Hanauer (2007) Ascend | Mc, db, RCT | Asacol 4.8 g vs 2.4 g | 6 wk | Descriptive, no score | Normal endoscopic finding | 25% vs 20% |
| Kamm (2007) MMX | Mc, db, RCT | MMX mes. 4.8 g vs 2.4 g vs placebo | 8 wk | Mod. Sutherland index | Mod Sutherland index < 1 | 77% vs 69% vs 46% |
| Kruis (2009) | Mc, db, RCT | Mesalazine 3 g vs 1g x 3 | 8 wk | Rachmilewitz | Rachmilewitz < 4 | 71% vs 70% |
Table 2 One of the problems in endoscopic ulcerative colitis scores is the application of varying criteria
| Truelove | Baron | Powell-T (St Mark’s) | Levine | Rach-milewitz | Modified Baron | Mayo | Sutherland | |
| Erythema | + | + | ||||||
| Edema | + | |||||||
| Granularity | + | + | + | |||||
| Vascular pattern | + | + | + | + | + | |||
| Friability | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Erosions | + | + | + | |||||
| Ulceration | + | + | + | + | ||||
| Exudate | + | + | ||||||
| Remission | 0 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0 |
Table 3 Proposal of the CBEHI classification to assess Crohn’s disease activity
| Activity level | Definition | Code |
| Clinical activity | Remission: CDAI < 150 | C0 |
| Active: CDAI ≥ 150 | C1 | |
| Biochemical activity | CRP normal | B0 (CRP) |
| Elevated CRP | B1 (CRP) | |
| Calprotectin < 200 μg/g | B0 (Calpro) | |
| Calprotectin ≥ 200 μg/g | B1 (Calpro) | |
| Endoscopic activity | Remission: SES-CD < 4 | E0 |
| Active: SES-CD ≥ 4 | E1 | |
| Histologic activity | Inactive | H0 |
| Active | H1 | |
| Imaging | Inactive: no fistulas, no stenoses | I0 |
| Active: presence of either fistula and/or stenosis | I1 |
- Citation: Rogler G, Vavricka S, Schoepfer A, Lakatos PL. Mucosal healing and deep remission: What does it mean? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(43): 7552-7560
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i43/7552.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7552
