Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5589-5594
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5589
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
PDT group (PDT with metal stenting)Control group (metal stent only)
(n = 18)(n = 15)
Age, yr (range)65.6 (44-89)67 (53-82)
Male sex12 (66)12 (80)
AJCC stage1
II3 (17)0 (0)
IIIA/IIIB0 (0)/6(33)3 (20)/5 (33)
IVA/IVB7 (39)/2 (11)1 (7)/6 (40)
Bismuth type
II3 (17)4 (27)
III5 (28)7 (47)
IV10 (55)4 (27)
Lymph node metastasis13 (72)10 (67)
Liver metastasis2 (11)2 (17)
CA 19-9 (U/mL)229 (0.9-4800)480 (1.3-4800)
Pre-albumin (g/dL)3.5 (2.1-4.5)3.2 (2.0-4.3)
Bilirubin (mg/dL)
Pre-treatment8.5 (0.6-31.9)12.3 (0.9-26.0)
Post-treatment1.3 (0.5-14.3)2.9 (0.3-26.0)
Successful drainage215 (83)12 (86)
Histologic confirmation14 (78)10 (67)
Unilateral/bilateral stenting10 (55)/8 (45)11 (73)/4 (27)
Early complications of procedure3 (17)2 (13)
Stent malfunctions14 (78)12 (80)
Follow-up period (median, d)437230
Table 2 Univariate analysis of all prognostic factors associated with stent patency and patient survival in all patients
VariablesUnivariate (Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test)
CasesMedian stent patency (d)P valueMedian patient survival (d)P value
Age (yr)
< 65 vs≥ 6512:21174:2060.524539:2900.103
Gender
Male vs female 24:9193:2980.278322:3030.766
CA 19-9 (U/mL)
< 100 vs≥ 100 7:26215:1770.308250:3170.145
Pre-PDT bilirubin (mg/dL)
< 3.0 vs≥ 3.015:18244:1810.112493:2500.026
T stage1
T1,2 vs T3,411:22174:2070.388317:2830.527
Number of endoprotheses
Unilateral vs bilateral21:12206:1930.454317:3220.758
Bismuth type
II, III vs IV19:14206:1930.644283:3560.551
PDT method
PTCS vs ERCP11:22200:3340.075322:2140.621
Treatment group
PDT vs ERBD18:15244:1770.002356:2830.023