Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2012; 18(28): 3721-3726
Published online Jul 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3721
Published online Jul 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3721
Table 1 Results of the patients reviewed
Group A | Group B | Total or average | |
Number | 156 | 33 | 189 |
Average hospitalization period (d) | 4.94 | 6.67 | 5.81 |
Location of lesion | |||
Colon (%) | 108 (69.2) | 23 (70.0) | 131 (69.0) |
Rectum (%) | 48 (30.8) | 10 (30.3) | 58 (31) |
Median size of lesion (mm) | 34.5 | 35 | 35 |
Hemorrhage (%) | 1 (0.6) | 4 (12.1) | 5 (2.6) |
Perforation (%) | 1 (0.6) | 6 (18.2) | 7 (3.7) |
Abdominal pain (%) | 2 (1.3) | 5 (15.2) | 7 (3.7) |
Fever > 38.0 °C (%) | 2 (1.3) | 2 (6.1) | 4 (2.1) |
WBC (cells/μL; median) | 6800a | 7700 | 7000 |
Hemoglobin level change pre-/post-ESD > 2.0 (%) | 5 (3.2) | 1 (3.0) | 6 (3.2) |
CRP (mg/dL; mean) | 0.4b | 0.5 | 0.4 |
- Citation: Aoki T, Nakajima T, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Sakamoto T, Itoi T, Khiyar Y, Moriyasu F. Assessment of the validity of the clinical pathway for colon endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(28): 3721-3726
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i28/3721.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i28.3721