Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2012; 18(18): 2203-2211
Published online May 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i18.2203
Published online May 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i18.2203
Table 1 Nutritional content per 100 g of supplement
| Whole soy powder1 | Calcium caseinate | |
| Energy (Kcal) | 392 | 371 |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 14 | 0.2 |
| Protein (g) | 40 | 97.4 |
| Total fat (g) | 18.8 | 2.4 |
| Alpha linolenic acid (mg) | 1252 | 0 |
| Linoleic acid (mg) | 9332 | 0 |
| Dietary fiber (g) | 18 | 0 |
| Isoflavones (mg) | 53.82 | 0 |
Table 2 Characterization of the study population n (%)
| CG-casein | IG-soy | Total | P value | |
| Demographic characteristics | ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 49 (61.2) | 53 (66.2) | 102 (63.8) | 0.621 |
| Female | 31 (38.8) | 27 (33.8) | 58 (36.2) | |
| Marital Status | ||||
| Married | 56 (70.0) | 55 (68.7) | 111 (69.4) | 1.001 |
| Single, widowed or divorced | 24 (30.0) | 25 (31.3) | 49 (30.6) | |
| Anthropometric data | ||||
| Body mass index | ||||
| < 25 kg/m2 | 40 (50.0) | 43(53.8) | 83 (51.9) | 0.7511 |
| ≥ 25 kg/m2 | 40 (50.0) | 37(46.2) | 77 (48.1) | |
| Waist circumference | ||||
| Adequate | 43 (53.7) | 46 (59.0) | 89 (56.3) | 0.5251 |
| Inadequate | 37 (46.3) | 32 (41.0) | 69 (43.7) | |
| Clinical data | ||||
| Genotype | ||||
| 1 | 66 (88.0) | 61 (79.2) | 127 (83.5) | 0.1891 |
| 2/3 | 9 (12.0) | 16 (20.8) | 25 (16.5) | |
| Necroinflammatory activity | ||||
| A0 | 26 (41.3) | 29 (46.8) | 55 (44.0) | 0.7921 |
| A1 | 26 (41.3) | 22 (35.5) | 48 (38.4) | |
| A2 e A3 | 11 (17.4) | 11 (17.7) | 22 (17.6) | |
| Stage of fibrosis | ||||
| F0/F1/F2 | 35 (55.6) | 40 (63.5) | 75 (59.5) | 0.4681 |
| F3/F4 | 28 (44.4) | 23 (36.5) | 51 (40.5) | |
| Hepatic steatosis | ||||
| Yes | 24 (40.0) | 19 (29.7) | 43 (34.7) | 0.2601 |
| No | 36 (60.0) | 45 (70.3) | 81 (65.3) | |
| HOMA-IR | ||||
| < 3.0 | 55 (53.9) | 47 (46.1) | 102 (63.7) | 0.251 |
| ≥ 3.0 | 25 (43.1) | 33 (56.9) | 58 (36.3) | |
| Biochemical data | Median (iq r) | Median (iq r) | ||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 91.0 (14.2) | 91.5 (14.2) | 0.702 | |
| HOMA-IR | 2.35 (2.24) | 2.26 (2.59) | 0.992 | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 96.5 (60.2) | 96.0 (67.2) | 0.572 | |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 149.0 (49.7) | 160.0 (44.0) | 0.422 | |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 44.0 (14.2) | 44.0 (15.5) | 0.302 | |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 90.5 (40.7) | 90.0 (43.0) | 0.942 | |
| AST (U/L) | 59.5 (40.7) | 52.0 (44.5) | 0.142 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 76.5 (54.5) | 73.5 (53.0) | 0.382 | |
| γGT (U/L) | 102.0 (118.0) | 87.0 (114.0) | 0.712 | |
| Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) | 79.0 (33.5) | 80.0 (53.2) | 0.492 | |
Table 3 Comparison of the distribution of hepatic steatosis before and after intervention between groups of patients with hepatitis C virus
| Hepatic Steatosis | n | Yes | No | P value |
| Before | 0.26041 | |||
| IG-soy | 64 | 19 (29.7) | 45 (70.3) | |
| CG-casein | 60 | 24 (40.0) | 36 (60.0) | |
| After | 0.18501 | |||
| IG-soy | 64 | 10 (15.6) | 54 (84.4) | |
| CG-casein | 60 | 16 (26.7) | 44 (73.3) | |
| IG-soy: before vs after | 0.0076 2 | |||
| With hepatic steatosis | 19 | 10 (52.6) | 9 (47.4) | |
| Without hepatic steatosis | 45 | 0 (0.0) | 45 (100.0) | |
| GC-casein: before vs after | 0.01332 | |||
| With hepatic steatosis | 24 | 16 (66.7) | 8 (33.3) | |
| Without hepatic steatosis | 36 | 0 (0.0) | 36 (100.0) |
Table 4 Median values of biochemical tests in patients with hepatitis C virus after protein supplementation
| CG-casein | IG-soy | Treatment difference | |||
| Exams | n | median (iq r) | n | median (iq r) | P value1 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 80 | 152.0 (61.5) | 80 | 153.0 (44.7) | 0.54 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 80 | 46.0 (17.0) | 80 | 43.5 (15.2) | 0.21 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 80 | 89.5 (45.0) | 80 | 84.5 (41.5) | 0.39 |
| AST (U/L) | 78 | 61.5 (40.5) | 80 | 49.5 (44.2) | 0.02 |
| ALT (U/L) | 78 | 73.0 (65.7) | 79 | 64.0 (50.0) | 0.007 |
| γGT (U/L) | 75 | 108.0 (120.5) | 73 | 84.0 (107.0) | 0.09 |
| HOMA-IR | 79 | 2.4 (2.7) | 80 | 2.6 (2.2) | 0.91 |
Table 5 Median values of biochemical tests in patients with hepatitis C virus at the beginning of monitoring and after protein supplementation
| IG-soy | CG-casein | |||||||||||
| Baseline | 12 wk | Baseline | 12 wk | |||||||||
| Exams | n | Median (iq r) | Median (iq r) | change | % change | P value1 | n | Median (iq r) | Median (iq r) | change | % change | P value1 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 80 | 160.0 (44.0) | 153.0 (44.7) | -7.0 | -7.37 | 0.05 | 80 | 149.0 (49.7) | 152.0 (61.5) | +3.0 | +2.01 | 0.63 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 79 | 44.0 (15.5) | 43.5 (15.2) | -0.5 | -1.14 | 0.69 | 80 | 44.0 (14.2) | 46.0 (17.0) | +2.0 | +5.54 | 0.13 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 78 | 90.0 (43.0) | 84.5 (41.5) | -5.5 | -6.11 | 0.03 | 80 | 90.5 (40.7) | 89.5 (45.0) | -1.0 | -1.10 | 0.66 |
| AST (U/L) | 80 | 52.0 (44.5) | 49.5 (44.2) | -2.5 | 4.81 | 0.32 | 78 | 59.5 (40.7) | 61.5 (40.5) | +2.0 | +3.36 | 0.04 |
| ALT (U/L) | 76 | 73.5 (53.0) | 64.0 (50.0) | -9.5 | -12.92 | 0.006 | 78 | 76.5 (54.5) | 73.0 (65.7) | -3.5 | -4.57 | 0.48 |
| γGT (U/L) | 73 | 87.0 (114.0) | 84.0 (107.0) | -3.0 | -3.45 | 0.007 | 75 | 102.0 (118.0) | 108.0 (120.5) | +6.0 | +5.88 | 0.19 |
| HOMA-IR | 80 | 2.3 (2.6) | 2.6 (2.2) | +0.3 | +13.04 | 0.23 | 79 | 2.3 (2.2) | 2.4 (2.7) | +0.1 | +4.35 | 0.09 |
Table 6 Logistic regression model for factors predictive of hepatic steatosis in patients with hepatitis C virus after 12 wk of protein supplementation
| Bivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
| Crude OR (95% IC) | P value | Adjusted OR1 (95% IC) | P value | |
| Groups | ||||
| Control-casein | 1 | 1 | ||
| IG-soy | 0.51 (0.20-1.22) | 0.135 | 0.25 (0.06-0.82) | 0.032 |
| HOMA-IR | ||||
| < 3.0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| ≥ 3.0 | 1.97 (0.82-4.77) | 0.129 | 3.49 (1.10-11.90) | 0.037 |
| Stage of fibrosis | ||||
| F0/F1/F2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| F3/F4 | 1.78 (0.68-4.69) | 0.239 | 1.59 (0.50-5.40) | 0.436 |
| γGT | ||||
| < 85 U/L | 1 | 1 | ||
| ≥ 85 U/L | 2.07 (0.81-5.64) | 0.135 | 1.52 (0.47-5.18) | 0.487 |
| HDL-C | ||||
| ≥ 35 mg/dL | 1 | 1 | ||
| < 35 mg/dL | 1.25 (0.41-3.40) | 0.677 | 2.18 (0.56-8.21) | 0.247 |
Table 7 Logistic regression model for factors predictive of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in patients with hepatitis C virus after 12 wk of protein supplementation
| Bivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
| Crude OR (95% IC) | P value | Adjusted OR1 (95% IC) | P value | |
| Groups | ||||
| Control-casein | 1 | 1 | ||
| Intervention-soy | 0.90 (0.47-1.70) | 0.745 | 1.92 (0.80-4.83) | 0.15 |
| Stage of fibrosis | ||||
| F0/F1/F2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| F3/F4 | 4.21 (1.99-9.19) | 0.0002 | 5.25 (2.17-13.67) | 0.0004 |
| Alanine aminotransferase | ||||
| 1.5 times below ULN | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1.5 times above ULN | 2.22 (1.16-4.30) | 0.017 | 3.26 (1.30-8.71) | 0.014 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 1 | 1 | ||
| Single, widowed or divorced | 0.52 (0.24-1.07) | 0.081 | 0.24 (0.08-0.65) | 0.007 |
| Waist circumference2 | ||||
| Adequate | 1 | 1 | ||
| Inadequate | 2.62 (1.37-5.16) | 0.004 | 5.57 (2.23-15.27) | 0.0004 |
Table 8 Logistic regression model for factors predictive of alanine aminotransferase levels in patients with hepatitis C virus after 12 wk of protein supplementation
| Bivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
| Crude OR (95% IC) | P value | Adjusted OR1 (95% IC) | P value | |
| Groups | ||||
| Control-casein | 1 | 1 | ||
| IG-soy | 0.55 (0.29-1.04) | 0.068 | 0.45 (0.22-0.89) | 0.024 |
| HOMA-IR | ||||
| < 3.0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| ≥ 3.0 | 2.22 (1.16-4.30) | 0.017 | 3.16 (1.51-6.93) | 0.001 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.39 (0.20-0.77) | 0.007 | 0.28 (0.12-0.60) | 0.003 |
| HDL-C | ||||
| ≥ 35 mg/dL | 1 | 1 | ||
| < 35 mg/dL | 3.15 (1.37-7.76) | 0.008 | 2.85 (1.18-7.40) | 0.024 |
- Citation: Oliveira LP, Jesus RP, Boulhosa RS, Mendes CMC, Gnoatto MC, Lemaire DC, Toralles MBP, Cavalcante LN, Lyra AC, Lyra LG. Effect of soy protein supplementation in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(18): 2203-2211
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i18/2203.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i18.2203
