Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2010; 16(3): 330-338
Published online Jan 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i3.330
Published online Jan 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i3.330
Table 1 Primer and probe sequence of the LightCycler system for q-MSP
| Gene | Primer sequence | Ref. | |
| CHFR | Forward | TTTCGTGATTCGTAGGCGAC | [33] |
| Reverse | CGACAACTAAAACGAAACCGA | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-CGCGAAAATAAACGCGTAAAAAACGCTCG-3'BHQ | ||
| p16 | Forward | TGGAATTTTCGGTTGATTGGTT | [34] |
| Reverse | AACAACGTCCGCACCTCCT | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM- ACCCGACCCCGAACCGCG -3'BHQ | ||
| RUNX3 | Forward | CGTTCGATGGTGGACGTGT | [35] |
| Reverse | GACGAACAACGTCTTATTACAACGC | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-CGCACGAACTCGCCTACGTAATCCG-3'BHQ | ||
| E-cadherin | Forward | AATTTTAGGTTAGAGGGTTATCGCGT | [34,36] |
| Reverse | TAACTAAAAATTCACCTACCGAC | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-CGCCCACCCGACCTCGCAT-3'BHQ | ||
| hMLH1 | Forward | CGTTATATATCGTTCGTAGTATTCGTGTTT | [34] |
| Reverse | CTATCGCCGCCTCATCGT | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-CGCGACGTCAAACGCCACTACG-3'BHQ | ||
| ABCG2 | Forward | TTGGGTAATTTGTGCGTTA | |
| Reverse | CTACGAAAATCACCAAACGCTC | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-TTAATCGCCGTCACTAACCGA-3'BHQ | ||
| BNIP3 | Forward | TAGGATTCGTTTCGCGTACG | [37] |
| Reverse | ACCGCGTCGCCCATTAACCGCG | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-CGTAAAATACGTATAACACGTACGAC-3'BHQ | ||
| β-actin | Forward | TGGTGATGGAGGAGGTTTAGTAAGT | [34] |
| Reverse | AACCAATAAAACCTACTCCTCCCTTAA | ||
| Probe | 5' FAM-ACCACCACCCAACACACAATAACAAACACA-3'BHQ |
Table 2 Primer and probe sequence of the LightCycler system for qRT-PCR
| Gene | Primer sequence | |
| CEA | Forward | AGTCTATGCAGAGCCACCCAA |
| Reverse | GGGAGGCTCTGATTATTTACCCA | |
| Probe | 5' FAM-ACCCTTCATCACCAGCAACAACTCCAA-3'BHQ | |
| CK19 | Forward | GACATGCGAAGCCAATATGA |
| Reverse | TCAGTAACCTCGGACCTGCT | |
| Probe | 5' FAM-CTGGTTCACCAGCCGGACTGAAGAATT-3'BHQ | |
| β-actin | Forward | CGAGCGCGGCTACAGCTT |
| Reverse | TCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTT | |
| Probe | 5' FAM-ACCACCACGGCCGAGCGG-3'BHQ |
Table 3 Clinicopathological factors of the patients (n = 80)
| Clinicopathological factors | n (%) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 28 (35.0) |
| Male | 52 (65.0) |
| Age (yr) | 65.9 ± 10.8 |
| Range | 39-88 |
| Histological type | |
| tub | 36 (45.0) |
| por/sig/muc | 44 (55.0) |
| Classification | |
| Group A: M-MP with CY(-) and P(-) | 35 (43.8) |
| Group B: SS-SI with CY(-) and P(-) | 31 (38.8) |
| Group C: CY(+) or P(+) | 14 (17.5) |
| Clinical stage at the sample collection | |
| I | 37 (46.3) |
| II | 8 (10.0) |
| III | 18 (22.5) |
| IV | 15 (18.8) |
| Peritoneal recurrence | 2 (2.5) |
Table 4 Relationship between the q-MSP results and depth of cancer invasion, CY and P classification n (%)
| Methylation status | Classification | P-value | ||
| Group A: M-MP with CY(-) and P(-) | Group B: SS-SI with CY(-) and P(-) | Group C: CY(+) or P(+) | ||
| CHFR | < 0.05 | |||
| (-) 77 (96) | 35 (100) | 31 (100) | 11 (79) | |
| (+) 3 (4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (21) | |
| p16 | 0.821 | |||
| (-) 33 (41) | 14 (40) | 14 (45) | 5 (36) | |
| (+) 47 (59) | 21 (60) | 17 (55) | 9 (64) | |
| RUNX3 | 0.304 | |||
| (-) 36 (45) | 19 (54) | 11 (35) | 6 (43) | |
| (+) 44 (55) | 16 (46) | 20 (65) | 8 (57) | |
| E cadherin | < 0.05 | |||
| (-) 52 (65) | 28 (80) | 17 (55) | 7 (50) | |
| (+) 28 (35) | 7 (20) | 14 (45) | 7 (50) | |
| hMLH1 | 0.861 | |||
| (-) 43 (54) | 20 (57) | 16 (52) | 7 (50) | |
| (+) 37 (46) | 15 (43) | 15 (48) | 7 (50) | |
| ABCG2 | 0.244 | |||
| (-) 30 (38) | 12 (34) | 10 (32) | 8 (57) | |
| (+) 50 (63) | 23 (66) | 21 (68) | 6 (43) | |
| BNIP3 | < 0.05 | |||
| (-) 50 (63) | 26 (74) | 20 (65) | 4 (29) | |
| (+) 30 (38) | 9 (26) | 11 (35) | 10 (71) | |
Table 5 Correlation between the multigene methylation of the peritoneal wash specimens form gastric cancer and the depth of cancer invasion, CY and P classification n (%)
| Multigene methylation (CHFR, E-cadherin, BNIP3) | P-value | ||
| Less than 2 genes | 2 or more genes | ||
| Classification | |||
| Group A: M-MP with CY(-) and P(-) | 32 (91) | 3 (9) | < 0.001 |
| Group B: SS-SI with CY(-) and P(-) | 25 (81) | 6 (19) | |
| Group C: CY(+) or P(+) | 6 (43) | 8 (57) | |
Table 6 Relationship between the qRT-PCR results and depth of cancer invasion, CY and P classification n (%)
| Methylation status | Classification | P-value | ||
| Group A: M-MP with CY(-) and P(-) | Group B: SS-SI with CY(-) and P(-) | Group C: CY(+) or P(+) | ||
| CEA | 0.352 | |||
| (-) 39 (62) | 17 (61) | 17 (71) | 5 (45) | |
| (+) 24 (38) | 11 (39) | 7 (29) | 6 (55) | |
| CK19 | < 0.05 | |||
| (-) 37 (59) | 21 (75) | 13 (54) | 3 (27) | |
| (+) 26 (41) | 7 (25) | 11 (46) | 8 (73) | |
Table 7 Comparison of the methylation status between cancerous tissue and peritoneal fluid in group C
| Sample No. | Pathology | CY | P | Examined tissue | Methylation status | |||||
| Tissue | Peritoneal fluid | |||||||||
| CHFR | E-cadherin | BNIP3 | CHFR | E-cadherin | BNIP3 | |||||
| A-03 | por | + | - | Primary cancer | Negative | Positive | Negative | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| A-09 | por | + | - | Primary cancer | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Positive | Positive |
| A-16 | por | + | + | Primary cancer | Positive | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Positive |
| A-29 | tub | + | + | Dissemination nodule | Negative | Positive | Negative | Negative | Positive | Positive |
| A-51 | por | + | - | Metastatic lymph node | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| A-59 | sig | - | + | Primary cancer | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| A-65 | por | - | + | Metastatic ovarian tumor | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Positive | Positive |
| A-69 | sig | + | + | Primary cancer | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Positive | Positive |
| A-78 | tub | + | - | Primary cancer | Negative | Positive | Positive | Negative | Positive | Positive |
Table 8 Correlation between peritoneal recurrence and multigene methylation and also the CK19 expression results in group B
| Multigene methylation (CHFR, E-cadherin, BNIP3) | P-value | CK19 | P-value | |||
| Less than 2 genes | 2 or more genes | Negative | Positive | |||
| Peritoneal recurrence | ||||||
| Positive | 0 | 2 | < 0.05 | 1 | 1 | 0.943 |
| Negative | 23 | 3 | 10 | 9 | ||
- Citation: Hiraki M, Kitajima Y, Sato S, Nakamura J, Hashiguchi K, Noshiro H, Miyazaki K. Aberrant gene methylation in the peritoneal fluid is a risk factor predicting peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(3): 330-338
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i3/330.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i3.330
