Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2009; 15(30): 3783-3787
Published online Aug 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3783
Published online Aug 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3783
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients (mean ± SD)
| Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 40) | P value | |
| Age (yr) | 31.33 ± 9.76 | 31.23 ± 9.13 | 0.962 |
| Gender (M/F) | 34/6 | 36/4 | 0.737 |
| Body mass index | 23.80 ± 3.40 | 23.43 ± 3.78 | 0.642 |
| No. of patients with previous colonoscopy (%) | 11 (27.5%) | 10 (25.0%) | 0.779 |
| Indication for colonoscopy n (%) | |||
| Change in bowel habit | 9 (22.5) | 10 (25.0) | 0.527 |
| Abdominal pain | 10 (25.0) | 12 (30.0) | |
| Rectal bleeding | 6 (15.0) | 7 (17.5) | |
| Polyp surveillance | 13 (32.5) | 9 (22.5) | |
| Anemia | 2 (5.0) | 2 (5.0) | |
| Time from onset of sedation to scope (min) | 1.18 ± 0.50 | 0.89 ± 0.31 | 0.003 |
| Total procedure time (min) | 14.80 ± 3.80 | 14.61 ± 3.83 | 0.824 |
| Time to ileal intubation (min) | 7.49 ± 3.24 | 8.21 ± 3.37 | 0.328 |
Table 2 Safety of sedation with split dose midazolam and meperidine vs single dose midazolam and meperidine (mean ± SD)
| Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 40) | P value | |
| Baseline systolic BP (mmHg) | 125.20 ± 9.76 | 125.40 ± 10.15 | 0.929 |
| Baseline pulse rate (/min) | 71.90 ± 9.71 | 72.63 ± 8.99 | 0.730 |
| Baseline oxygen saturation (%) | 97.88 ± 1.98 | 97.95 ± 2.04 | 0.868 |
| Drop in blood pressure | 1 (2.5%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0.556 |
| Alteration in heart rate | 3 (7.5%) | 2 (5.0%) | 0.745 |
| Drop in oxygen saturation | 2 (5.0%) | 8 (20.0%) | 0.043 |
Table 3 Recovery rate from sedation state (mean ± SD)
| Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 40) | P value | |
| Aldrete score (5 min) | 4.28 ± 1.06 | 5.75 ± 0.95 | < 0.001 |
| Aldrete score (10 min) | 6.55 ± 0.50 | 7.00 ± 0.68 | 0.001 |
| Aldrete score (30 min) | 8.73 ± 0.85 | 9.32 ± 0.69 | 0.001 |
| Time from scope out to discharge | 37.05 ± 6.87 | 33.75 ± 5.75 | 0.022 |
Table 4 Visual analog scale for pain, memory, and satisfaction reported by patients
| Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 40) | Pvalue | |
| Pain | 0.95 ± 1.15 | 1.58 ± 1.15 | 0.018 |
| Memory | |||
| On insertion | 0.80 ± 0.82 | 1.08 ± 0.89 | 0.155 |
| On ileal intubation | 1.38 ± 1.21 | 1.93 ± 0.94 | 0.026 |
| On scope out | 0.93 ± 1.02 | 1.58 ± 1.38 | 0.019 |
| Satisfaction | 8.93 ± 1.07 | 8.68 ± 1.09 | 0.305 |
- Citation: Lee H, Kim JH. Superiority of split dose midazolam as conscious sedation for outpatient colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(30): 3783-3787
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i30/3783.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.3783
