Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2009; 15(30): 3783-3787
Published online Aug 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3783
Superiority of split dose midazolam as conscious sedation for outpatient colonoscopy
Hyuk Lee, Jeong Hwan Kim
Hyuk Lee, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 135-710, South Korea
Jeong Hwan Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 143-729, South Korea
Author contributions: Lee H designed and performed the study and wrote the manuscript; Kim JH was involved in editing and commenting on the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Jeong Hwan Kim, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-729, South Korea. sefamily@medimail.co.kr
Telephone: +82-2-20305010
Fax: +82-2-20305029
Received: May 16, 2009
Revised: July 6, 2009
Accepted: July 14, 2009
Published online: August 14, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To elucidate the efficacy and safety of a split dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine for colonoscopy.

METHODS: Eighty subjects undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomly assigned to group A or B. Group A (n = 40) received a split dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine. Group B (n = 40) received a single dose of midazolam in combination with meperidine. Outcome measurements were level of sedation, duration of sedation and recovery, degree of pain and satisfaction, procedure-related memory, controllability, and adverse events.

RESULTS: Group A had a lower frequency of significant hypoxemia (P = 0.043) and a higher sedation score on withdrawal of the endoscope from the descending colon than group B (P = 0.043). Group B recovered from sedation slightly sooner than group A (P < 0.002). Scores for pain and memory, except insertion-related memory, were lower in group A one week after colonoscopic examination (P = 0.018 and P < 0.030, respectively). Poor patient controllability was noted by the endoscopist and nurse in group B (P = 0.038 and P = 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Split dose midazolam in combination with meperidine resulted in a safer, more equable sedation status during colonoscopic examination and a reduction in procedure-related pain and memory, but resulted in longer recovery time.

Keywords: Amnesia; Colonoscopy; Conscious sedation; Midazolam