Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics for 583 study cases
Small (≤ 10 mm) | Large (> 10 mm) | P value | |
No. of lesions, n (%) | 120 (21) | 463 (79) | |
Gender (M/F) | 85/35 | 289/174 | 0.09 |
Age (yr), mean (range) | 61.5 (39-84) | 62.4 (30-90) | 0.86 |
Macroscopic type, n (%) | |||
Sessile (0-Is, Is+IIa) | 51 (42) | 233 (50) | 0.13 |
Flat (0-IIa) | 14 (12) | 64 (14) | |
Depressed (0-IIc, IIa+IIc, Is+IIc) | 55 (46) | 166 (36) | |
Size (mm), mean ± SD | 8.3 ± 1.6 | 22.1 ± 9.6 | |
Growth pattern (PG/NPG) | 38/82 | 250/213 | < 0.0001 |
Location, n (%) | |||
Rectum | 33 (27) | 213 (46) | 0.02 |
Distal colon1 | 56 (47) | 139 (30) | |
Proximal colon2 | 31 (26) | 111 (24) |
Table 2 Incidence of LNM and clinicopathological characteristics based on tumor size n (%)
Small (≤ 10 mm) | Large (> 10 mm) | P value | |
LNM | 10/89 (11.2) | 46/381 (12.1) | 0.85 |
Depth of invasion | |||
sm-superficial (< 1000 &mgr;m) | 30 (25) | 83 (18) | 0.08 |
sm-deep (≥ 1000 &mgr;m) | 90 (75) | 380 (82) | |
LVI | 26 (22) | 125 (27) | 0.23 |
PDA | 12 (10) | 79 (17) | 0.06 |
Table 3 Comparison of treatment strategy and positive rate of cut margin n (%)
Small (≤ 10 mm) | Large (> 10 mm) | P value | |
Initial treatment | |||
EMR | 62 (52) | 133 (29) | < 0.0001 |
Surgery | 58 (48) | 330 (71) | |
Positive rate of cut margin1 | 11 (18) | 26 (20) | 0.81 |
In EMR cases | |||
Lateral | 0 (0) | 8 (31) | 0.08 |
Vertical | 11 (100) | 18 (69) |
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and incidence of LNM based on the treatment strategy n (%)
EMR (n = 195) | Surgery (n = 388) | P value | |
Depth of invasion | |||
sm-superficial (< 1000 &mgr;m) | 61 (32) | 52 (13) | < 0.0001 |
sm-deep (≥ 1000 &mgr;m) | 134 (69) | 336 (87) | |
LVI | 33 (17) | 118 (30) | 0.0006 |
PDA | 18 (9) | 73 (19) | 0.0006 |
Positive rate of cut margin1 | 37 (19) | 0 (0) | < 0.0001 |
Lateral | 8 (22) | 0 (0) | |
Vertical | 29 (78) | 0 (0) | |
Additional surgical operation | 82 (42) | - | |
LNM | 9/82 (11.0) | 47/388 (12.1) | 0.79 |
- Citation: Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fujii T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Kobayashi N, Emura F, Ono A, Shimoda T, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Sano Y, Fujimori T. Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i22/2708.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2708