Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2009; 15(21): 2644-2650
Published online Jun 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2644
Published online Jun 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2644
Table 1 Ranking of associated tumors in family relatives of 256 probands
Associated tumors | FGC (n =112) | Non-FGC (n =144) | No. of associated tumors | Percentage | ||
Male proband1 (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband2 (n = 98) | Female proband3 (n = 46) | |||
Stomach | 108 | 46 | 154 | 38.6 | ||
Esophagus | 7 | 1 | 43 | 22 | 73 | 18.3 |
Liver | 2 | 1 | 17 | 18 | 38 | 9.5 |
Colorectum | 1 | 23 | 10 | 34 | 8.5 | |
Lung | 4 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 25 | 6.3 |
Nasopharynx | 14 | 3 | 17 | 4.3 | ||
Breast | 3 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 3.3 | |
Urogenital organ | 1 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 3.0 | |
Larynx | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | ||
Pancreas | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1.0 | ||
Others4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 23 | 5.8 |
Total | 129 | 53 | 136 | 81 | 399 | 100 |
Table 2 Distribution and number of affected relatives of 256 probands
Affected relatives | FGC (n = 112) | Non-FGC (n =144) | No. of affected relatives | Percentage | ||||
Male proband (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | |||||
GC | Non-GC | GC | Non-GC | Non-GC | Non-GC | |||
Father | 31 | 3 | 14 | 38 | 18 | 104 | 26.5 | |
Mother | 17 | 5 | 9 | 24 | 19 | 74 | 18.8 | |
Brother | 34 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 23 | 7 | 80 | 20.4 |
Sister | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 41 | 10.4 |
Son | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 2.8 | |||
Daughter | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2.0 | |
Second-degree | 17 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 75 | 19.1 |
Total | 108 | 20 | 46 | 7 | 133 | 79 | 393 | 100 |
Table 3 Ratio of male to female in affected first-degree relatives in four subgroups
Gender of affected relatives | FGC (n = 112) | Non-FGC (n = 144) | ||
Male proband (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | |
Male | 73 | 26 | 64 | 32 |
Female | 33 | 17 | 42 | 31 |
Total | 106 | 43 | 106 | 63 |
Ratio of male to female | 2.21 | 1.53 | 1.52 | 1.03 |
Table 4 Relative risk of GC by comparing male with female probands from their paternal or maternal history of cancers
Affected parents | FGC1 (n = 108) | OR (95% CI) | Non-FGC (n = 144) | OR (95% CI) | ||
Male proband (n = 72) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | |||
Father | 31 | 14 | 1.19 (0.53-2.69) | 38 | 18 | 0.99 (0.48-2.02) |
Mother | 17 | 9 | 0.93 (0.37-2.35) | 24 | 19 | 0.46 (0.22-0.97) |
Table 5 Comparison of 14 probands with both affected parents
Serial number | Father | Mother | Proband | Adenocarcinoma of proband |
1 | GC | GC | Son | Poorly |
2 | GC | BC | Son | Poorly |
3 | GC | EMC | Son | Poorly |
4 | GC | EC | Son | Poorly |
5 | HC | GC | Son | Poorly |
6 | HC | EC | Daughter | Moderately |
7 | EC | EC | Son | Moderately |
8 | EC | EC | Daughter | Moderately |
9 | CRC | EC | Son | Poorly |
10 | CRC | BC | Daughter | Poorly |
11 | LC | CRC | Son | Poorly |
12 | LC | LC | Daughter | Mucinous |
13 | NPC | PC | Son | Poorly |
14 | NPC | HC | Daughter | Signet-ring cell |
Table 6 Distribution of tumor histological types (converting the WHO to the Lauren classification) of 256 probands
Lauren classification | WHO classification | FGC (n = 112) | Non-FGC (n = 144) | ||
Male proband (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | ||
Intestinal type | Well | 3 | 2 | ||
Moderately | 19 | 6 | 39 | 12 | |
Mucinous | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
Total | 27 | 9 | 46 | 15 | |
Diffuse type | Poorly | 44 | 24 | 39 | 25 |
Signet-ring cell | 3 | 2 | 11 | 6 | |
Undifferentiated | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
Total | 49 | 27 | 52 | 31 |
Table 7 Distribution of anatomical sites of tumors in 256 probands
Tumor site | FGC (n = 112) | Non-FGC (n = 144) | ||
Male proband (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | |
Upper | 22 | 5 | 42 | 16 |
27 | 58 | |||
Medium | 20 | 7 | 27 | 15 |
27 | 42 | |||
Lower | 34 | 24 | 29 | 15 |
58 | 44 | |||
χ2 , P value | χ2 = 10.69, P < 0.05 |
- Citation: Zhou XF, He YL, Song W, Peng JJ, Zhang CH, Li W, Wu H. Comparison of patients by family history with gastric and non-gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(21): 2644-2650
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i21/2644.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2644