Jung E, Clevert D, Schreyer A, Schmitt S, Rennert J, Kubale R, Feuerbach S, Jung F. Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: A prospective controlled two-center study. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(47): 6356-6364 [PMID: 18081224 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6356]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ernst Michael Jung, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg 93053, Germany. emjung@gmx.de
Article-Type of This Article
Liver Cancer
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2007; 13(47): 6356-6364 Published online Dec 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6356
Table 1 The sensitivity and specificity of results analysis
Disease existent
Disease non-existent
Test positive
a
b
a + b
Test negative
c
d
c + d
a + c
b + d
Table 2 Results based on contrast-enhanced CHI during the arterial phase
Tumor present
Tumor not present
Test positive
40
19
59
Test negative
19
22
41
59
41
100
Table 3 Results based on contrast-enhanced CHI during the portal-venous phase
Tumor present
Tumor not present
Test positive
54
10
64
Test negative
5
31
36
59
41
100
Table 4 Results based on contrast-enhanced CHI during the late phase
Tumor present
Tumor not present
Test positive
58
4
62
Test negative
1
37
38
59
41
100
Table 5 Diagnostic value of quantitative CHI for detection of malignant hepatic tumors in different phases after intravenous application of ultrasound contrast agent
Arterial phase
Portal-venous phase
Late venous phase
Specificity (%)
53.7
75.6
90.2
Sensitivity (%)
67.8
91.5
98.3
Positive prognostic value
67.8
84.4
93.5
Negative prognostic value
53.7
86.1
97.4
Table 6 Specificity and sensitivity for both testing centers
Center 1 n = 50
Center 2 n = 50
Total n = 100
Specificity (%)
85.7
95.0
90.2
Sensitivity (%)
100
96.7
98.3
Negative prognostic value
100
95.0
97.4
Positive prognostic value
90.6
96.7
93.5
Citation: Jung E, Clevert D, Schreyer A, Schmitt S, Rennert J, Kubale R, Feuerbach S, Jung F. Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: A prospective controlled two-center study. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(47): 6356-6364