Liver Cancer
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2007; 13(47): 6356-6364
Published online Dec 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i47.6356
Evaluation of quantitative contrast harmonic imaging to assess malignancy of liver tumors: A prospective controlled two-center study
EM Jung, DA Clevert, AG Schreyer, S Schmitt, J Rennert, R Kubale, S Feuerbach, F Jung
EM Jung, AG Schreyer, J Rennert, Feuerbach S, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg 93043, Germany
DA Clevert, Department of Radiology, Ultrasound Section, Großhadern Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistr, 15, München 81377, Germany
S Schmitt, Department of Trauma Surgery, Passau Hospital, Innstraße 76, Passau 94034, Germany
R Kubale, Institutes of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Pirmasens Hospital, Germany
F Jung, Center for Biomaterial Development, Institute of Polymer Research, GKSS, Kantstr, 55, Teltow 14513, Germany
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Ernst Michael Jung, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg 93053, Germany. emjung@gmx.de
Telephone: +49-941-9447401 Fax: +49-941-9447402
Received: June 29, 2007
Revised: September 10, 2007
Accepted: November 27, 2007
Published online: December 21, 2007
Abstract

AIM: To establish the extent to which contrast enhancement with SonoVue in combination with quantitative evaluation of contrast-medium dynamics facilitates the detection of hepatic tumors.

METHODS: One hundred patients with histologically confirmed malignant or benign hepatic tumor (maximum size 5 cm) were analyzed. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (bolus injection 2.5 mL SonoVue) was carried out with intermittent breath-holding technique using a multifrequency transducer (2.5-4 MHz). Native vascularization was analyzed with power Doppler. The contrast-enhanced dynamic ultrasound investigation was carried out with contrast harmonic imaging in true detection mode during the arterial, portal venous and late phases. Mechanical index was set at 0.15. Perfusion analysis was performed by post-processing of the raw data [time intensity curve (TIC) analysis]. The cut-off of the gray value differences between tumor and normal liver tissue was established using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis 64-line multi-slice computed tomography served as reference method in all cases. Magnetic resonance tomography was used additionally in 19 cases.

RESULTS: One hundred patients with 59 malignant (43 colon, 5 breast, 2 endocrine metastases, 7 hepatocellular carcinomas and 2 kidney cancers) and 41 benign (15 hemangiomas, 7 focal nodular hyperplasias, 5 complicated cysts, 2 abscesses and 12 circumscribed fatty changes) tumors were included. The late venous phase proved to be the most sensitive for classification of the tumor type. Fifty-eight of the 59 malignant tumors were classified as true positive, and one as false negative. This resulted in a sensitivity of 98.3%. Of the 41 benign tumors, 37 were classified as true negative and 4 as false negative, which corresponds to a specificity of 90.2%. Altogether, 95.0% of the diagnoses were classified as correct on the basis of the histological classification. No investigator-dependency (P = 0.23) was noted.

CONCLUSION: The results show the possibility of accurate prediction of malignancy of hepatic tumors with a positive prognostic value of 93.5% using advanced contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Contrast enhancement with SonoVue in combination with quantitative evaluation of contrast-medium dynamics is a valuable tool to discriminate hepatic tumors.

Keywords: Liver tumors; Malignant tumor; Contrast harmonic imaging; Quantitative contrast enhancement