Peng JJ, Cai SJ, Lu HF, Cai GX, Lian P, Guan ZQ, Wang MH, Xu Y. Predicting prognosis of rectal cancer patients with total mesorectal excision using molecular markers. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(21): 3009-3015 [PMID: 17589956 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i21.3009]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Ye Xu, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong’an Road, Shanghai 200032, China. caisanjun@csco.org.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Basic Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Distribution of stage II or III patients with or without adjuvant chemotherapy
Adjuvant chemotherapy(n = 179)
P
No
Yes
Cases
%
Cases
%
N staging
N0
114
68.2
33
35.9
< 0.05
N1
33
19.8
29
31.5
N2
20
12
30
32.4
T staging
T1-2
90
53.9
11
12
< 0.05
T3
38
22.7
47
51
T4
39
23.4
34
37
Differentiation
High-Medium
145
86.8
77
83.7
> 0.05
Low
22
13.2
15
16.3
Lymphovascular invasion
None
19
11.4
14
15.6
> 0.05
Yes
148
88.6
78
84.4
Neural invasion
None
14
8.4
7
7.6
> 0.05
Yes
154
91.6
85
92.4
Table 3 Association between IHC and clinicopathological data
Characteristics
P53 (n)
P21 (n)
PCNA (n)
CD44 (n)
+
-
P
+
-
P
+
-
P
+
-
P
Tumor location
High
29
33
NS
53
9
NS
36
26
NS
32
30
NS
Median
53
62
93
22
70
45
63
52
Low
36
46
63
19
53
29
34
48
Pathology
Adeno.
109
127
NS
191
45
< 0.05
144
92
NS
117
119
NS
Muci
8
10
16
2
13
5
11
7
Signet
1
4
2
3
2
3
1
4
TNM stage
I
34
46
NS
59
21
NS
47
33
NS
37
43
NS
II
30
37
58
9
42
25
33
34
III
54
58
92
20
70
42
59
53
Invasion depth
T1-2
46
55
NS
74
27
0.052
63
38
NS
46
55
NS
T3
36
49
72
13
55
30
43
42
T4
36
37
63
10
41
32
40
33
Lymphnode meta.
N0
64
83
NS
117
30
NS
89
58
NS
70
77
NS
N1-2
54
58
92
20
70
42
59
53
Lymph-vascular invasion
+
17
16
NS
25
8
NS
21
12
NS
19
14
NS
-
101
125
184
42
138
88
110
116
Neural invasion
+
11
10
NS
18
3
NS
15
6
NS
11
10
NS
-
107
131
191
47
44
94
118
120
Preoperative CEA
+
18
30
NS
41
7
NS
30
18
NS
109
102
NS
-
100
111
168
42
129
82
20
28
Table 4 Variables association with overall survival, DFS, recurrence and metastasis
n
Survival
DFS
Local recurrence
Metastasis
%
P
%
P
%
P
%
P
Gender
Male
146
85.6
NS
78.1
< 0.05
5.5
NS
16.4
NS
Female
113
89.4
87.6
2.7
9.7
Tumor location
NS
NS
NS
High
62
88.7
85.5
3.2
12.9
Medium
115
87.8
83.5
6.1
10.4
NS
Low
82
85.4
80.5
2.4
18.3
Pathology
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
Adenocarcinoma
236
87.7
83.9
3.8
13.1
Mucinous cancer
18
94.4
83.3
5.6
11.1
NS
Signet ring cancer
5
40
40
20
40
Differentiation
High-medium
222
87.4
NS
82.9
NS
4.1
NS
13.1
NS
Low
37
86.5
78.4
5.4
16.2
TNM staging
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
I
80
95
92.5
1.3
6.3
II
67
92.5
89.6
1.5
9.0
< 0.05
III
112
78.6
70.3
8
21.4
Invasion depth
< 0.05
<0.05
NS
T1-2
101
95.0
91.1
2
6.9
T3
85
83.5
78.8
4.7
16.5
< 0.05
T4
73
80.8
75.3
6.8
19.2
N staging
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
N0
147
93.9
91.2
1.4
7.5
< 0.05
N1-2
112
78.6
72.3
8.0
21.4
Lymphvascular invasion
NS
NS
NS
+
33
81.8
78.8
6.1
15.2
-
226
88.1
83.6
4
13.3
NS
Neural invasion
NS
NS
+
21
85.7
NS
85.7
4.8
14.3
-
238
87.4
82.8
4.2
13.4
NS
Preoperative CEA
0.06
< 0.05
NS
+
48
20.8
31.3
6.3
25
-
211
10.9
14.7
3.8
10.9
< 0.05
P53
NS
NS
+
118
84.4
80.9
6.4
0.06
13.5
NS
-
141
90.7
85.6
1.7
13.6
P21
NS
NS
NS
+
209
87.6
81.8
4.3
13.9
NS
-
50
86
84
4.0
12.0
PCNA
NS
NS
NS
12.6
+
159
89.3
84.3
3.1
15.0
NS
-
100
84.0
81.0
6.0
CD44
< 0.05
< 0.05
NS
+
129
82.9
76.7
6.2
17.1
0.97
-
130
91.5
87.8
2.3
10.0
Citation: Peng JJ, Cai SJ, Lu HF, Cai GX, Lian P, Guan ZQ, Wang MH, Xu Y. Predicting prognosis of rectal cancer patients with total mesorectal excision using molecular markers. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(21): 3009-3015