Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2006; 12(25): 4026-4028
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4026
Published online Jul 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4026
Age (yr) | Sex | Size (mm) | Margin | Additional therapy |
Group 1 | ||||
74 | M | 3 | Negative | (-) |
34 | F | 5 | Negative | (-) |
61 | M | 7 | Negative | (-) |
46 | F | 8 | Positive | Transanal resection |
64 | M | 6 | Negative | (-) |
75 | M | 6 | Positive | Ligation |
Group 2 | ||||
55 | M | 5 | Negative | (-) |
77 | M | 9 | Negative | (-) |
70 | M | 7 | Negative | (-) |
51 | F | 4 | Negative | (-) |
63 | M | 10 | Negative | (-) |
74 | F | 4 | Negative | (-) |
60 | F | 5 | Negative | (-) |
51 | M | 6 | Negative | (-) |
- Citation: Sakata H, Iwakiri R, Ootani A, Tsunada S, Ogata S, Ootani H, Shimoda R, Yamaguchi K, Sakata Y, Amemori S, Mannen K, Mizuguchi M, Fujimoto K. A pilot randomized control study to evaluate endoscopic resection using a ligation device for rectal carcinoid tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(25): 4026-4028
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i25/4026.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4026