BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Rapid Communication
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2005; 11(47): 7515-7519
Published online Dec 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7515
Table 1 Clinical features
CaseAgeGenderEtiologyGVChildHCC
159MHBVLg f F3C+
269FAIHLg cf F2B-
356FALCLg f F2B-
469FHCVLg f F3B-
553FAIHLg f F3B-
654MHCVLg f F2B+
764MHCVLg cf F3B-
853FHCVLg cf F2B-
945MALCLg f F3B-
1050MALCLg cf F3B-
1156FALCLg f F3B-
1272FHCVLg c F3B-
1365MHCVLg c F3C-
1462FAIHLg f F2B-
1572MHCVLg c F2B-
1650MALCLg cf F2C-
Table 2 Hemodynamics features of gastric varices
CaseInflowing Vessels
Outflowing Vessels
LGVPGVSGVG-R shuntPCPVHAZVLIPV
1-+-++-+
2.--++--+
3-+++--+
4+++++-+
5-+++--+
6--++---
7-++++--
8++++--+
9-+++++-
10+++++++
11-++++++
12-++++--
13+++++++
14+--+---
15+--+---
16-++++--
Table 3 CT-MIP compared with conventional angiographic portography for inflowing vessels of gastric varices
Inflowing vesselsCT-MIP imagingConventional DSA
LGV66
PGV1212
SGV1311
Table 4 CT-MIP compared with conventional angiographic portography for outflowing vessels of gastric varices
Outflowing vesselsCT-MIP imagingConventional DSA
G-R shunt1616
PCPV89
LIPV89
HAZV44


Write to the Help Desk