Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2005; 11(43): 6800-6806
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800
Published online Nov 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800
Table 1 Classical risk factors of cholecystolithiasis in multiple logistic regression
| Classical risk factors | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
| Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.05–1.08 | <0.001 |
| Female sex | 2.78 | 1.91–4.07 | <0.001 |
| BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.12 | 1.08–1.15 | <0.001 |
| Positive family history | 1.89 | 1.30–2.75 | <0.001 |
Table 2 History of pregnancy and the number of prior pregnancies in the multiple logistic regression model (only females)
| Factor tested | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
| Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.04–1.08 | <0.001 |
| BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.11 | 1.07–1.15 | <0.001 |
| Positive family history | 1.99 | 1.28–3.07 | 0.002 |
| Positive history of pregnancy | 0.76 | 0.44–1.31 | 0.321 |
Table 3 Number of pregnancies in the multiple logistic regression model (only females)
| Factor tested | Odds ratio (OR) | 95%CI | P |
| Age (per yr) | 1.06 | 1.04–1.08 | <0.001 |
| BMI (per kg/m2) | 1.11 | 1.07–1.15 | <0.001 |
| Positive family history | 2.09 | 1.34–3.25 | <0.001 |
| Number of pregnancies | 0.104 | ||
| One or two vs none | 0.65 | 0.37–1.15 | |
| Three or more vs none | 1.04 | 0.56–1.94 |
Table 4 Relative risk for gall bladder stones in relation to selection of study population
| Place/region | Populationselection | n | Sex distributionmale:female |
| Chiayi[23] | Random sample | 923 | 1:1.0 |
| Rome[32] | Factory | 2 325 | 1:1.1 |
| Bergen[40] | Random sample | 1 371 | 1:1.1 |
| Ulm[19] | Blood donors | 1 116 | 1:1.1 |
| Copenhagen[44] | Random sample | 4 807 | 1:1.4 |
| Chiang Mai[38] | Random sample | 6 146 | 1:1.5 |
| Schwedt[41] | Factory | 1 616 | 1:1.6 |
| Okinawa[17] | Inhabitants of an island | 2 584 | 1:1.7 |
| Jiaotong[14] | Random sample | 15 856 | 1:2.0 |
| M.I.C.O.L[24] | Random sample | 29 739 | 1:2.0 |
| Römerstein[20] | Total survey | 2 498 | 1:2.1 |
| Sirmione[21] | Total survey | 1 911 | 1:2.2 |
| Cianciano[22] | Total survey | 1 804 | 1:2.3 |
| Leutkirch | Random sample | 2 401 | 1:2.3 |
Table 5 Review of published studies addressing the effect of the factor “pregnancy” on the prevalence of gallbladder stones
| Factor by which the prevalence of gallstone diseasein women with prior pregnancy is increased | 1.0–1.5 times | 1.6–2.5 times | 2.6–10 times | 11 – 50 times |
| Studies showing a quantitative relation between cholecystolithiasis and pregnancy | 1966 Framingham[42] 1988 Sirmione[21] 1985 San Antonio[45] 1985 Maastricht[46] | 1982 Oxford[47] 1982 Kopenhagen[44] | 1979 Stockholm[48] 1982 Rom[32] 1986 Schwedt[41] 1986 Chianciano[22] 1991 Santiago[49] | 1988 Srinagar[15] |
| Studies not showing a quantitative relation between cholecystolithiasis and pregnancy | 1956 Birmingham[50] 1970 Pima reservation[51] 1980 Boston[52] 1982 Oberpfuss[53] 1983 Oxford[54] 1984 Adelaide[55] 1989 Soweto[12] 1990 Dublin[43] 1995 Ulm[19] 1996 Römerstein[20] 2002 Leutkirch | |||
- Citation: Walcher T, Haenle MM, Kron M, Hay B, Mason RA, Schmiesing AFAV, Imhof A, Koenig W, Kern P, Boehm BO, Kratzer W. Pregnancy is not a risk factor for gallstone disease: Results of a randomly selected population sample. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(43): 6800-6806
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i43/6800.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6800
