Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2005; 11(37): 5840-5844
Published online Oct 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i37.5840
Published online Oct 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i37.5840
Table 1 Patients according to the grade of esophageal dilatation and surgical treatment adopted
| Esophageal Dilatation | Surgical Technique | Patients (%) |
| Group II | 53 | |
| Cardiomyectomy with fundoplication (Pinotti’s technique) | 53 | |
| Group III | 37 | |
| Cardiomyectomy with fundoplication | 32 | |
| Grondahl cardioplasty with hemigastrectomy and Roux-en-Y diversion (Serras Doria operation) | 5 | |
| Group IV | 34 | |
| Grondahl cardioplasty with hemigastrectomy and Roux-en-Y diversion | 26 | |
| Mucosectomy | 4 | |
| Merendino’s operation | 2 | |
| Gastrostomy | 2 |
Table 2 Postoperative complications according to the functional class classification
Table 3 Preoperative ECG results in patients with Chagasic esophageal achalasia
| ECG results | Patients (n) | % |
| Normal ECG | 44 | 35.48 |
| Isolated ventricular extrasystoles | 58 | 37.09 |
| Complete right bundle branch block | 35 | 28.22 |
| Primary change in ventricular repolarization | 12 | 9.67 |
| First-degree atrioventricular block (1st degree AVB) | 16 | 12.9 |
| Second-degree atrioventricular block (2nd degree AVB) | 2 | 1.61 |
| Mobitz I | ||
| Second-degree atrioventricular block (2nd degree AVB) | 3 | 2.41 |
| Mobitz II | ||
| Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) | 8 | 6.4 |
| Upper anterior divisional block (DB) | 11 | 8.87 |
| Complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) | 3 | 2.41 |
| Paired ventricular extrasystoles | 9 | 7.25 |
| Supraventricular extrasystoles | 6 | 4.83 |
| Atrial fibrillation (AF) | 4 | 3.22 |
Table 4 Correlation between postoperative complications and ECG changes
| Results | ECG results | |||
| Normal (n = 44) | With abnormalities (n = 80) | |||
| n | % | n | % | |
| No complications | 27 | 61.4 | 23 | 28.8 |
| With complications | ||||
| CHF/shock | 2 | 11.8 | 8 | 14 |
| Death | 1 | 5.9 | 3 | 5.3 |
| Others | 14 | 82.4 | 46 | 80.7 |
Table 5 Postoperative complications according to the degree of dilation of the Chagasic achalasia
| Complications | Achalasia groups | |||||
| II (n = 53)b,d | III (n = 37)1 | IV (n = 34) | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| No complications | 33 | 62.26 | 13 | 35.14 | 4 | 11.76 |
| With complications | 20 | 37.74 | 32 | 64.86 | 38 | 88.24 |
| CHF/shock | - | 0 | 6 | 18.75 | 7 | 18.42 |
| Death | - | 0 | 2 | 6.25 | 2 | 5.26 |
| Others | 20 | 100 | 24 | 75 | 29 | 76.32 |
Table 6 Postoperative cardiovascular complications after surgical treatment of Chagasic esophageal achalasia
| Complications | Patients (%) |
| Decompensated congestive heart failure | 12 (9.67) |
| Cardiogenic shock | 03 (2.41) |
| Ventricular extrasystole | 58 (46.77) |
| Sinus bradycardia | 22 (17.74) |
| Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia | 12 (9.67) |
| Sustained ventricular tachycardia | 01 (0.80) |
| Acute atrial fibrillation | 05 (4.03) |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | 03 (2.41) |
| Temporary complete atrioventricular block | 01 (0.80) |
| Acute arterial occlusion | 04 (3.22) |
| Stroke | 03 (2.41) |
| Pulmonary embolism | 02 (1.67) |
| Acute renal failure | 02 (1.67) |
Table 7 Risk index for Chagasic achalasia
| (a) Points | |
| Achalasia | Points |
| Grade II | 9 |
| Grade III | 13 |
| Grade IV | 17 |
| Primary changes in ventricular repolarization | Points |
| Yes | 15 |
| No | 0 |
| Arrhythmias | Points |
| Yes | 12 |
| No | 0 |
| Functional class | Points |
| 1 | 6 |
| 2 | 12 |
| 3 | 24 |
| (b) Final index | |
| Points | Risk level |
| Up to 21 | Mild |
| From 22 to 34 | Moderate |
| Above 34 | High |
| (c) Probability of accuracy of the risk level | |
| Risk levels | Probability (%) |
| Mild | 82.4 |
| High | 94.6 |
- Citation: Neto JG, Cleva R, Zilberstein B, Gama-Rodrigues JJ. Surgical risk for patients with Chagasic achalasia and its correlation with the degree of esophageal dilation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(37): 5840-5844
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i37/5840.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i37.5840
