Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2005; 11(31): 4833-4837
Published online Aug 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4833
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study subjects
Disease
CharacteristicUCCDControl
Number of subjects9560200
Age range (yr)14–8317–7520–60
Age (mean±SD)44.4±16.4b35.0±12.632.5±11.1
Male/female (%)53 (55.8)/42 (44.2)35 (58.3)/25 (41.7)125 (62.5)/75 (37.5)
Table 2 Distributions of six NAT2-haplotypes in patients with UC/CD and controls
HaplotypeSNPNumber (%) of subjects with haplotype
UC (allele = 190)CD (allele = 120)Control (allele = 400)
NAT2*4None122 (64.2)77 (64.2)278 (69.5)
NAT2*5BT341C, C481T, A803G3 (1.6)1 (0.8)2 (0.5)
NAT2*6AC282T, G590A43 (22.6)21 (17.5)79 (19.75)
NAT2*7BC282T, G857A20 (10.5)18 (15.0)35 (8.75)
NAT2*11C481T0 (0)1 (0.8)1 (0.25)
NAT2*13C282T2 (1.1)2 (1.7)5 (1.25)
Table 3 Comparisons of frequencies of NAT2-haplotypes among study subjects by multiple logistic regression analysis
HaplotypePOdds ratio95% confidence interval
UC patients vs controls
NAT2*40.68230.8090.293–2.232
NAT2*6A0.56211.1830.671–2.084
NAT2*7B0.33381.4360.689–2.992
CD patients vs controls
NAT2*40.26162.1620.563–8.304
NAT2*6A0.38981.3490.682–2.670
NAT2*7B0.0132.8021.243–6.316
Table 4 Number of subjects with or without haplotype NAT2*7B
NAT2*7BUC(n = 95, %)CD(n = 60, %)Control(n = 200, %)
Presence19 (20.0)17 (28.3)32 (16.0)
Absence76 (80.0)43 (71.7)168 (84.0)
Table 5 Distributions of three UGT1A7 haplotypes among study subjects
HaplotypeSNPNumber (%) of subjects with haplotype
UC (allele = 190)CD (allele = 120)Control (allele = 400)
UGT1A7*1None120 (63.2)69 (57.5)242 (60.5)
UGT1A7*2T387G, C391A, G392A29 (15.3)24 (20.0)55 (13.8)
UGT1A7*3T387G, C391A, G392A,41 (21.6)27 (22.5)103 (25.7)
T622C
UGT1A7*4T622C0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)