Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2005; 11(28): 4409-4413
Published online Jul 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i28.4409
Table 1 Comparison of allele frequency between MAP group and SAP group
MAP (n = 106)SAP (n = 109)P
CC9495
IL-1βCT1214
+3 594TT00
T allele12 (5.7)14 (6.4)0.74
GG00
IL-10AA7581
-1 082GA3128
G allele31 (14.6)28 (12.8)0.592
CC6266
CD-14TT1414
-159CT3029
T allele58 (27.4)57 (26.1)0.777
Table 2 Comparison of allele frequency between AP and controls
AP (n = 215)Controls (n = 116)P
CC18998
IL-1βCT2618
+3 594TT00
T allele26 (6.0)18 (7.8)0.399
GG00
IL-10AA15679
-1 082GA5937
G allele59 (13.7)37 (15.9)0.437
CC12871
CD-14TT2813
-159CT5932
T allele115 (26.7)58 (25.0)0.626
Table 3 Comparison of allele frequency between septic shock and nonseptic shock groups
Septic shock (n = 33)Nonseptic shock (n = 76)P
CC2768
IL-1βCT68
+3 594TT00
T allele6 (9.1)8 (5.3)0.289
GG00
IL-10AA1962
-1 082GA1414
G allele14 (21.2)14 (9.2)0.015
CC1947
CD-14TT59
-159CT920
T allele19 (28.8)38 (25.0)0.559
Table 4 Comparison of allele frequency based on different etiologies of SAP (n)%
AlleleAlcoholic SAP (n = 23)Gallstone SAP (n = 49)Idiopathic SAP (n = 34)P
IL-1β+3 594 T3 (6.5)6 (6.1)5 (7.4)0.952
IL-10-1 082 G7 (15.2)12 (12.2)9 (13.2)0.886
CD-14-159 T11 (23.9)25 (25.5)21 (30.9)0.653