Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 2004; 10(24): 3634-3638
Published online Dec 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i24.3634
Table 1 Patients’ demographics
Characteristic
Age (yr)
Median52
Range18-76
Sex
Male (%)35 (70%)
Female (%)15 (30%)
ECOG Performance Status
Grade 015 (30%)
Grade 121 (42%)
Grade 214 (28%)
Pretreatment
Total39 (78%)
Surgical24 (48%)
Chemotherapy37 (74%)
Radiotherapy20 (40%)
Biotherapy8 (16%)
Two or more treatment31 (62%)
Tumor size (cm2)
Median12.5
Range1.43-360
Table 2 Response of H101 injected lesion and control lesion
LesionnMedian area (cm2)Efficacy
Response rate (%)
CRPRMRSDPD
H101 injection4612.53111113830.4
Control4611.3157211213.0
Table 3 Efficacy of 46 evaluable patients treated with H101 and chemotherapy
Type of tumornResponse (CR + PR)
SCCHN1154
Esophageal cancer83
Gastric cancer50/
Lung cancer41
Colorectal cancer31
Breast cancer31
Soft tissue sarcoma31
Malignant melanoma21
Lymphoma11
Chordoma11
Ovarian cancer10
Table 4 Treatment-related toxicity
Adverse eventGrade
Total (%)
IIIIIIIV
Fever1051016 (30.2)
Injection site pain1220014 (26.4)
Nausea and vomiting1350018 (34.0)
Leucopenia1273426 (49.1)
Liver dysfunction20013 (5.7)
Flu-like symptom1320015 (28.3)
Alopecia33107 (13.2)
Table 5 Humoral immune response and plasma H101 viral genome test
Before injection
After injection
NegativePositiveNegativePositive
Ad neutralizing titer11359
Plasma H101 PCR11074