Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 1, 2004; 10(13): 1939-1942
Published online Jul 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1939
Published online Jul 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1939
Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV | |
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
Esophageal varices | 26 (89.7) | 9 (56.25) | 8 (80) | 4 (100) |
Paragastric varices | 25 (86.2) | 11 (68.75) | 7 (70) | 3 (75) |
Cirsomphalos | 12 (41.3) | 11 (68.75) | 8 (80) | 4 (100) |
Retroperitoneal varices | 11 (37.9) | 9 (56.25) | 6 (60) | 4 (100) |
Paraesophageal varices | 13 (44.8) | 10 (62.5) | 7 (70) | 3 (75) |
Dilated azygos vein | 6 (20.1) | 13 (81.25) | 9 (90) | 2 (50) |
Dilated left renal vein | 2 (6.9) | 1 (6.25) | 1 (10) | 3 (75) |
Paragallbladder varices | 0 (0) | 1 (6.25) | 1 (10) | 2 (50) |
Hepatic artery-portal vein fistula | 0 (0) | 3 (18.75) | 6 (60) | 4 (100) |
Portal vein emboli | 2 (6.9) | 8 (50) | 7 (70) | 3 (75) |
- Citation: Chu Q, Li Z, Zhang SM, Hu DY, Xiao M. Relationship between encephalopathy and portal vein-vena cava shunt: Value of computed tomography during arterial portography. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(13): 1939-1942
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i13/1939.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1939