Published online Jul 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i26.119212
Revised: February 17, 2026
Accepted: March 30, 2026
Published online: July 14, 2026
Processing time: 160 Days and 9.6 Hours
Loop stoma is usually used to divert the fecal stream, with the aim of protecting the downstream anastomosis or allowing sufficient time for the repaired perfo
We present a case of mesh hernioplasty after the spontaneous closure of a trans
Spontaneous stoma closure is rare. Long-term follow-up is recommended to de
Core Tip: Spontaneous stoma closure is a rare phenomenon, and its mechanism remains unclear. The factors contributing to this phenomenon encompass stoma retraction and the healing process of enterocutaneous fistula. We present a case of incisional mesh hernioplasty after spontaneous closure of a transverse loop colostomy. This is the first reported case in the English literature of mesh hernioplasty following spontaneous stoma closure. Although spontaneous stoma closure may avoid a second operation, clinicians should pay attention to the long-term complications such as incisional hernia formation.
- Citation: Ai W, Liang ZH, Liu B. Incisional mesh hernioplasty following spontaneous stoma closure: A case report. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(26): 119212
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i26/119212.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i26.119212
With the advancement of surgical techniques and promotion of the injury control concept, the use of enterostomy has increased significantly. Temporary enterostomy, as a necessary procedure in some specific clinical scenarios, is applied in malignant diseases, such as low-rectal cancer with anal preservation, and benign diseases[1]. It always requires additional surgery to close after the desired period of time, be it primary repair of stoma or resection followed by anastomosis[2]. In the United States, 725000 to 1 million people have undergone stoma surgery. In China, the number of people with per
A 56-year-old male complained of recurrent abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, lasting for 1 month.
Symptoms started 1 month prior to presentation, including abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. There were no accompanying symptoms such as fever or diarrhea.
The patient denied any family history of malignant tumors or other genetic diseases.
Body temperature: 36.6 °C; blood pressure: 117/77 mmHg; heart rate: 80 beats/minute; respiratory rate: 20 breaths/minute. Height: 160 cm; weight: 65 kg; body mass index: 25.4 kg/m2. The upper abdominal scar healed well, with no leakage of intestinal contents. However, there was a peristomal bulge, measuring 4 cm × 5 cm, that was more pronounced in the standing position. Digital anal examination was not performed.
Hemoglobin decreased to 103 g/L (normal range: 130-170 g/L). No other abnormality was found in routine blood and urine analyses.
Computed tomography revealed a 4 cm × 5 cm incisional hernia at the site of the initial surgical stoma (Figure 1). The transverse colon had been retracted from the skin to the subcutaneous tissue layer (Figure 1C). Evaluation via colono
Incisional hernia after spontaneous closure of transverse loop colostomy.
There were no obvious signs intraoperatively of contamination in the abdominal cavity after exploration; therefore, we decided to perform stoma reversal and incisional hernia repair using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh method. A 10-mm trocar, serving as the observation port for laparoscopy, was placed at the left navel level and the lateral border of the rectus abdominis under direct vision through the initial incision. The stoma site incision was closed using nonabsorbable sutures, ensuring stability of the intraperitoneal pneumoperitoneum. Two additional 5-mm trocars were placed at the lateral edge of the rectus abdominis muscle, 6 cm above and below the left navel level, under direct laparoscopic vision after the pneumoperitoneum pressure reached 12 mmHg. A cropped 10 cm × 15 cm antiadhesion mesh (initial 10 cm × 20 cm, 5959480, BARD, United States) was placed and flattened beneath the incision, followed by fixation with hernia clips.
Postoperative recovery went smoothly. The patient was given a liquid diet on the first day after the operation and discharged on the fifth day. After 2 months follow-up, computed tomography showed no evidence of hernia recurrence (Figure 1E).
Enterostomy is an opening of the intestinal tract onto the anterior abdominal wall, to protect a distal gastrointestinal anastomosis, to relieve a benign or malignant obstruction, or to control sepsis related to perforation[6]. Stoma types or methods are diverse and can be classified according to time limit (temporary or permanent); intestinal segment (small intestine or colon); method (loop, end or double lumen); or location (right lower abdomen, right upper abdomen, left upper abdomen or left lower abdomen)[7,8].
The incidence of complications related to enterostomy is high, which seriously affects quality of life[9]. Early complications (< 1 month) include strangulation, ischemia, stenosis, obstruction, and mucocutaneous separation fistula. Late complications (> 1 month) include retraction, prolapse, parastomal hernia, and fistula[10]. In 2023, the China Stoma Management Collaborative Group reached a consensus on a new classification of enterostomy complications, which consists of classification and grading. The classification pertains to the categorization of enterostomy complications, reflecting the anatomical origin and cause of these complications. The grading is the modified Clavien-Dindo grading, a refinement of the existing grading system, reflecting the severity of complications, intervention level, and medical consumption[11].
Ge et al[12] compared the complications of ileostomy and colostomy. The stoma prolapse rate of ileostomy was lower than that of colostomy (1.27% vs 15.63%, P = 0.0002). The incidence of skin irritation and parastomal hernia was higher in ileostomy than in colostomy. Conversely, the incidence of parastomal fistula, enterocutaneous fistula, stenosis, and hemorrhage was higher in colostomy than in ileostomy[12].
The spontaneous closure of a stoma without surgical intervention is rare, and its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Stoma retraction (with synchronous restoration of rectal function without other complications) appears to be a crucial factor that facilitates spontaneous closure. Stoma retraction is a major complication of stomas, with an incidence rate as high as 25%. It refers to the highest point of the stoma intestinal mucosa retracting to the skin level or below it[13]. Often, it is preceded by disruption of the skin-mucosa suture line and is associated with stoma edema, cellulitis, and possible intraperitoneal leakage of effluent, which may require repeat laparotomy[14]. Stoma retraction depends on many factors, including intestinal hypoperistalsis; intestinal edema during emergency diversion surgery in the presence of mesenteric thickening and peritonitis; mucocutaneous separation; ischemic necrosis; and excessive weight gain. Albandar and Fatani[15] reported a case of self-manipulation in a patient who pushed the protruded stoma inside and eventually experienced regular stool passage. Figure 2 shows the probable process of spontaneous stoma closure with gradual stoma retraction.
Another potential mechanism for the spontaneous closure of the stoma is associated with healing of the enterocutaneous fistula. Enterostomy can be regarded as a postoperative, low-volume, and superficial intestinal cutaneous fistula, without infection or distal obstruction. All these factors are conducive to the spontaneous healing of the intestinal cutaneous fistula. The stoma, a type of iatrogenic end-to-end fistula, may gradually transform into a lateral fistula via stoma retraction. As long as the distal intestinal tract remains intact and healthy, the fistula may close spontaneously over time. However, its closure can be delayed by several factors, which are represented by the acronym FRIEND, standing for foreign body, radiation, infection, epithelialization, neoplasm, and distal obstruction[16]. With conservative management, 19%-92% of postoperative fistulae heal spontaneously, provided that there is no distal obstruction, the bowel is not diseased, and the patient is in an anabolic state[17,18].
Unfortunately, the risk of incisional hernia at the stomal site is inevitable after spontaneous closure, given the fascial defect at the closure site[19]. However, this situation may not be immediately apparent after closure but may manifest itself in a delayed manner. The reported incidence of incisional hernia following stoma closure is around 30%[20]. The risk is higher when the stoma closes spontaneously due to persistent muscle defects. Furthermore, daily activities, exertion, and long-term weight gain may gradually enlarge the muscle defect. In most cases, if the muscle defect exceeds 2 cm, patch hernia repair is required.
So far, only seven cases of spontaneous stoma closure have been reported in the English literature. Five of these cases involved ileal loop stomas, while two involved colonic loop stomas (Table 1)[10,15-17,21,22]. The time range for complete stoma closure was 3 weeks to 6 months. It is worth noting that some patients had received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or antituberculosis treatment, which may affect stoma closure. Conservative management was used in all cases except the one reported by Thota et al[17]. In that case, anatomical repair was performed because diverticulectomy may turn the wound into a clean-contaminated one, increasing the risk of infection of the patch used for the hernia repair. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of mesh hernioplasty after spontaneous closure of a transverse loop colostomy.
| Ref. | Year | Age (years) | Gender | Original pathology | Primary surgery | Type of stoma | Treatment plan after stoma surgery | Time to closure | Treatment plan after stoma closure |
| Saxena et al[21] | 2015 | 26 | F | Tubercular perforation of terminal ileum | Mesenteric lymph node biopsy and loop ileostomy | Loop ileostomy | Antitubercular treatment | 6 months | Observe |
| Pandit et al[22] | 2016 | 64 | M | Perforation at the rectosigmoid junction | Perforation repair and proximal sigmoid loop colostomy | Sigmoid loop colostomy | N/A | 3 weeks | Observe |
| Pandit et al[22] | 2016 | 45 | M | Rectal adenocarcinoma | Laparoscopic low anterior resection with covering loop ileostomy | Loop ileostomy | Chemoradiotherapy | 6 weeks | Observe |
| Alyami et al[16] | 2016 | 65 | F | Colon adenocarcinoma | En bloc total colectomy, hysterectomy, and bilateral salpingoophorectomy, side-to-end stapled ileorectal anastomosis and loop ileostomy | Loop ileostomy | Chemotherapy | 10 weeks, 18 weeks1 | Observe |
| Saxena et al[10] | 2022 | 18 | F | Ileal perforation | Histopathological examination and loop ileostomy at the perforation site | Loop ileostomy | N/A | 4 months | Observe |
| Thota et al[17] | 2022 | 42 | M | Hirschsprung’s disease | Duhamel procedure | Loop sigmoid colostomy | N/A | 8 weeks | Diverticulum resection and anatomical repair |
| Albandar and Fatani[15] | 2024 | 67 | F | Adenocarcinoma of splenic flexure | Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and a diverting loop ileostomy | Loop ileostomy | Chemoradiotherapy | 6 months | Resection of the closed stoma and a side-to-side anastomosis |
| Present case | 2025 | 56 | M | Car accident injury | Partial small intestinal resection and transverse loop colostomy | Transverse loop colostomy | N/A | 6 months | Mesh hernioplasty |
Spontaneous stoma closure is rare and its mechanism remains unclear. The contributory factors include stoma retraction and the healing process of enterocutaneous fistula. Due to the limitations of the case report study and limited follow-up duration, it may be difficult to obtain generalized conclusions regarding optimal management. Long-term follow-up is recommended to detect the development of incisional hernia at an early stage.
| 1. | Harries RL, Torkington J. Stomal Closure: Strategies to Prevent Incisional Hernia. Front Surg. 2018;5:28. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in RCA: 18] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Ojerskog B, Andersson H, Bosaeus I, Brevinge H, Nilsson LO. Total body water and total body potassium in ileostomy patients before and after conversion to the continent ileostomy. Gut. 1988;29:1198-1201. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-249. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 76817] [Cited by in RCA: 70293] [Article Influence: 14058.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (58)] |
| 4. | Kanth P, Inadomi JM. Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer. BMJ. 2021;374:n1855. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 248] [Cited by in RCA: 218] [Article Influence: 43.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (4)] |
| 5. | Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-Related Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32:176-182. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in RCA: 106] [Article Influence: 15.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 6. | Martin ST, Vogel JD. Intestinal stomas: indications, management, and complications. Adv Surg. 2012;46:19-49. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in RCA: 27] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Parmar KL, Zammit M, Smith A, Kenyon D, Lees NP; Greater Manchester and Cheshire Colorectal Cancer Network. A prospective audit of early stoma complications in colorectal cancer treatment throughout the Greater Manchester and Cheshire colorectal cancer network. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:935-938. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 70] [Cited by in RCA: 75] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Formijne Jonkers HA, Draaisma WA, Roskott AM, van Overbeeke AJ, Broeders IA, Consten EC. Early complications after stoma formation: a prospective cohort study in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:1095-1099. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 43] [Cited by in RCA: 56] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Watson AJ, Nicol L, Donaldson S, Fraser C, Silversides A. Complications of stomas: their aetiology and management. Br J Community Nurs. 2013;18:111-112, 114, 116. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in RCA: 14] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 10. | Saxena N, Agarwal S, Akash A. The case of spontaneous stoma closure in patient with loop ileostomy. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;94:107081. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Chinese Ostomy Collaboration Group (COCG); Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing Committee of Chinese Nursing Association; Colon and Rectal Surgeon Committee of Surgeon Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Committee of Colorectal Cancer,Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Colorectal Surgery Group of Surgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association. [Criteria of enterostomy complications: classification and grading (2023 edition)]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023;26:915-921. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Ge Z, Zhao X, Liu Z, Yang G, Wu Q, Wang X, Zhang X, Cheng Z, Wang K. Complications of preventive loop ileostomy versus colostomy: a meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and systematic review. BMC Surg. 2023;23:235. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Salvadalena G, Hendren S, McKenna L, Muldoon R, Netsch D, Paquette I, Pittman J, Ramundo J, Steinberg G. WOCN Society and ASCRS Position Statement on Preoperative Stoma Site Marking for Patients Undergoing Colostomy or Ileostomy Surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015;42:249-252. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 58] [Cited by in RCA: 51] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:279-285. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 194] [Cited by in RCA: 178] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | Albandar M, Fatani JA. Spontaneous Stoma Closure: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cureus. 2024;16:e52403. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Alyami MS, Lundberg PW, Cotte EG, Glehen OJ. Spontaneous ileostomy closure. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:694-697. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 17. | Thota R, Nachiappan M, Gadiyaram S. A Rare Occurrence of Spontaneous Closure of a Sigmoid Loop Colostomy and an Inevitable Ventral Hernia. Cureus. 2022;14:e21161. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 18. | Lloyd DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC. Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1045-1055. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 129] [Cited by in RCA: 115] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
| 19. | Contini S. Spontaneous ileostomy closure. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:1163-1164. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 20. | Bhangu A, Nepogodiev D, Futaba K; West Midlands Research Collaborative. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure. World J Surg. 2012;36:973-983. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 106] [Cited by in RCA: 99] [Article Influence: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 21. | Saxena A, Kumar L, Singh M, Kolhe Y, Karande SK, Venkatesh P, Sahai RN. Spontaneous closure of an ileostomy: A rare occurrence. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;7C:124-126. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 22. | Pandit N, Singh H, Kumar H, Gupta R, Verma GR. Spontaneous closure of stoma. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2016;4:325-327. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |