Basic Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2015; 21(23): 7191-7196
Published online Jun 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7191
β-2 Adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism and response to propranolol in cirrhosis
De-Run Kong, Jin-Guang Wang, Bin Sun, Chen Chen, Fang-Fang Yu, Jian-Ming Xu, Department of Gastroenterology, the first Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China
Ming-Quan Wang, Department of Radiology, the first Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China
Author contributions: Kong DR, Wang JG, Sun B and Wang MQ contributed equally to this work; Wang JG and Kong DR performed the majority of experiments and analyzed the data; Sun B and Wang MQ performed the molecular investigations; Chen C and Yu FF participated equally in treatment of patients; Kong DR and Xu JM designed and coordinated the research; Kong DR and Wang JG wrote the paper.
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81271736.
Ethics approval: This study was approval from the Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University.
Conflict-of-interest: We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work.
Data sharing: Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset could be available from the corresponding author at kdr168@sohu.com. Participants gave informed consent for data sharing.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: De-Run Kong, MD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, the first Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China. kongderun@ahmu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-551-62922105 Fax: +86-551-65120742
Received: October 27, 2014
Peer-review started: October 28, 2014
First decision: December 26, 2014
Revised: January 26, 2015
Accepted: February 11, 2015
Article in press: February 11, 2015
Published online: June 21, 2015
Processing time: 235 Days and 19.6 Hours

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the association of β-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) gene polymorphism with response of variceal pressure to propranolol in cirrhosis.

METHODS: Sixty-four non-related cirrhotic patients participated in this study and accepted variceal pressure measurement before and after propranolol administration. Polymorphism of the β2-AR gene was determined by directly sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction products from the DNA samples that were prepared from the patients.

RESULTS: The prevalence of Gly16-Glu/Gln27 and Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes, and compound heterozygotes was 29.7%, 10.9%, and 59.4%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis with Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes had a greater decrease of variceal pressure after propranolol administration than those with Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes or with compound heterozygotes (22.4% ± 2.1%, 13.1% ± 2.7% and 12.5% ± 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: The variceal pressure response to propranolol was associated with polymorphism of β2-AR gene. Patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes probably benefit from propranolol therapy.

Key Words: Variceal bleeding; β2-adrenergic receptor; Propranolol; Variceal pressure; Homozygotes

Core tip: The study explored the influence of β-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) polymorphism and the response of esophageal variceal pressure to chronic treatment with propranolol. The originality was that we associated the polymorphism to the measurement of variceal pressure and considered the response to propranolol administration. We found that the variceal pressure response to propranolol was associated with β2-AR gene polymorphisms, and that the patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes seem to benefit more from propranolol therapy.



INTRODUCTION

Variceal bleeding is a severe complication of patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. More than 40% of cirrhosis patients have esophageal varices at the time of diagnosis. Nearly 30% of those patients with large esophageal varices will bleed within 2 years[1]. Nonselective β-blockers are effective in preventing first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis[2-4] because these drugs can reduce portal pressure[5,6]. Previous studies have reported that variceal bleeding can be effectively prevented by a decrease in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) < 12 mmHg after prophylactic propranolol therapy, or spontaneously[6,7]. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that patients with a decrease in HVPG from baseline of ≥ 20% have a low risk of first variceal bleeding and rebleeding[8,9], even if the final HVPG is > 12 mmHg[10-13].

Although the nonselective β-blockers decrease the portal pressure in cirrhosis patients, the response is not uniform. In a study involving 60 cirrhosis patients, 24 showed no reduction or even a slight increase in HVPG with propranolol[14]. Some patients who took the maximum tolerated dose of propranolol still had frequent bleeding, and did not display a significant decrease in the level of HVPG. Previous studies have found that β-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) was polymorphic within the human population and that polymorphism of β2-AR gene plays a key role in modulating cardiovascular function. A more detailed study indicated that the two most common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) determine the hemodynamic response to propranolol occur at codons 46 and 79[11]. Several studies in healthy participants have shown that Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes express an upregulatory vasodilatory response to local infusions of receptor agonists, whereas Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes express a downregulatory vasodilatory response[15-17]. Patients with cirrhosis with Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes have a greater decrease in heart rate, cardiac index, and hepatic blood flow after propranolol administration than those with Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes. However, the HVPG responses to propranolol are similar in both groups[12]. Previous studies evaluated only an acute HVPG response to intravenous propranolol administration according to β2-AR gene SNPs, and did not take variceal pressure (VP) into account. VP is a major predictor of variceal bleeding risk; hence, it is an important marker of the response to pharmacological therapy in patients with portal hypertension[18-21].

Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the association between VP response to propranolol and β2-AR gene polymorphism, and the prevalence of β2-AR gene polymorphisms in a small subgroup of patients with esophageal varices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Selection of patients

Between January 2010 and December 2012, a group of 64 cirrhotic patients (43 male and 21 female) were randomly selected to participate in the study. Their ages ranged from 18 to 70 years (median 50 years). All the patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis by liver biopsy and clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and ultrasonographic criteria. Esophageal varices were detected via upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination. The causes of hepatic cirrhosis were hepatitis B virus (n = 51), alcohol (n = 7), cryptogeny (n = 5) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC, n = 1). Patients with the following criteria were excluded from the study: severe clotting defects, hepatic encephalopathy grade III and IV; Child-Pugh score > 12 points; multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma; contraindications to β-blocker therapy; pregnancy; or refusal to participate in the study. Patients with the VP < 15.2 mmHg were also excluded, along with patients who had undergone endoscopic interventions, including endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University, and all patients gave written informed consent. A 2-mL venous blood sample was obtained from each patient and stored at -80 °C for further genotypic analysis.

Study design and VP measurement

Measurement of VP was performed after an overnight fast during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Somatostatin infusion was stopped 2 h before starting VP measurement. VP was assessed with a previously described noninvasive technique using an esophageal variceal manometer (EVM; Esophageal Varix Manometer; Treier Endoscopie AG, Beromünster, Switzerland) and recorded by a workstation that was developed by our team[22]. Before VP measurement, all patients were sedated with 5 mg diazepam and 20 mg n-butylscopolamine intravenously. In previous studies, VP measured by this method had a good correlation with that measured by needle puncture[23,24]. The largest varix of the distal esophagus was chosen for VP measurement. VP in each patient was measured five times. VP was recorded as the mean of five determinations that were taken during the procedure.

After VP measurement, the scales in the balloon markers (5-mm intervals) were used to assess variceal size. The maximal variceal size and esophageal variceal findings were recorded as proposed by the Japanese Society for portal hypertension[25]. After baseline measurement, propranolol was given orally at an initial dose of 20 mg three times daily and was increased by 20 mg every day over a period of 7 d until the resting heart rate was reduced by 25%, or was < 55 beats/min[4]. VP was assessed again at 7 d of propranolol administration.

Two β2-AR gene functional SNPs were selected for genotyping in this study: Arg16Gly and Gln27Glu.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from the prefabricated blood samples for genotype analysis. Two β2-AR SNPs, Arg16Gly and Gln27Glu, were analyzed by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR). The primers were designed as described previously[12]. For the Arg16Gly site, the upstream primer of Arg16 was 5’-CTTCTTGCTGGCACCCAATA-3’, while that of Gly16 was 5’-CTTCTTGCTGGCACCCAATG-3’, and the downstream primer was 5’-CCAATTTAGGAGGATGTAAACTTC-3’. For analysis of the Gln27Glu site, the following primers were designed, the upstream primer of Gln27 was 5’-GGACCACGACGTCACGCAGC-3’, and that of Glu27 was 5’-GGACCACGACGTCACGCAGG-3’, and the downstream primer of both was 5’-ACAATCCACACCATCAAGAAT-3’. The reaction was performed in a 50-μL mixture as follows: DNA template 2 μL, each primer 1 μL, dNTP 1 μL, Pfu DNA polymerase 1 μL, 10× Buffer 5 μL (containing Mg2+ 20 mmol/L), deionized distilled water 39 μL. The PCR was performed with an initial 94 °C for 5 min (pre-degeneration), followed by 35 cycles (94 °C for 2 min, degeneration; 55 °C for 1 min, annealing for Arg16Gly, and 52 °C for 1 min for Gln27Glu; 72 °C for 1 min for polymerization), and a final step at 72 °C for 10 min to finish the reaction. The PCR products were separated at 100 V for 50 min on a 1% agarose gel and were visualized with ethidium bromide staining.

Calculation of sample size

Sample size was calculated to detect differences between groups with different polymorphisms in VP decrease from baseline of ≥ 10% after oral propranolol, with a common variance of 40. With an expected prevalence of 15% in the lower frequent homozygotes (Arg16-Gln27) among the general population[26,27], it was estimated that 47 patients would be required in the study, to achieve 80% power at the 5% level of significance.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD and were compared using Student’s t test. One-way ANOVA followed by pre-planned analysis was used to compare the differences between the groups with different polymorphisms. Comparisons of categorical variables between different groups were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 12.0 software. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS
Genotype analysis

We used the AS-PCR to test β2-AR SNPs in 64 individuals. The frequencies for three homozygotes were Gly16/Glu27 = 28.1%, Gly16/Gln27 = 1.6%, Arg16/Gln27 = 10.9%, and compound heterozygotes = 59.4%. No significant differences were seen in baseline characteristics between the groups of different polymorphisms (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic profile of the study population.
Arg16-Gln27 (n = 7)Compound heterozygotes (n = 38)Gly16-Glu/Gln27 (n = 19)P value
Sex (M/F)5/227/1111/80.630
Age (yr), mean ± SD51.60 ± 10.9149.02 ± 22.5251.95 ± 8.760.733
Etiology
Hepatitis B532140.425
Alcohol142
Cryptogenic113
Primary biliary cirrhosis010
Alcohol intake, Y/N0/76/323/160.756
History of bleeding, Y/N2/58/305/140.858
Ascites, Y/N0/711/275/140.332
Albumin, g/L32.88 ± 5.8532.36 ± 5.6333.13 ± 4.720.668
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)46.99 ± 35.9240.76 ± 23.9152.61 ± 69.650.072
Prothrombin time (s)16.18 ± 2.2315.84 ± 2.3015.22 ± 2.560.713
Serum sodium (mmol/L)138.50 ± 5.43138.30 ± 4.74139.12 ± 4.80.768
Child-Pugh score6.86 ± 1.216.61 ± 1.526.74 ± 1.910.168
VP (mmHg)21.35 ± 3.0222.08 ± 3.2621.69 ± 2.780.367
Baseline VP and response to propranolol

All patients had severe portal hypertension as shown by VP > 15.2 mmHg and the presence of esophageal varices. No significant differences were seen in the baseline VP among homozygous haplotypes (Table 1).

As expected, propranolol administration (80-160 mg/d, median: 120 mg/d) caused a significant decrease in heart rate in each group. The median daily dose of propranolol was 105 ± 34 mg in the Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes, 113 ± 38 mg in the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes, and 108 ± 35 mg in the compound homozygotes. There were no significant differences among haplotypes (P > 0.05). We also found that Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes had a greater reduction in heart rate than Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes (-20.2% ± 1.4% vs -14.8% ± 2.2% respectively, P = 0.03) (Table 2). Compound heterozygotes were found to have intermediate response compared to those homozygotes after oral propranolol treatment (-16.9% ± 2.9%).

Table 2 Heart rate and VP changes after propranolol according to β2-AR gene polymorphisms.
VariablesGly16-Glu/Gln27 (n = 19)
Compound heterozygotes (n = 38)
Arg16-Gln27 (n = 7)
Baseline7 dBaseline7 dBaseline7 d
HR (beats/min)76.3 ± 2.760.5 ± 1.8b75.6 ± 4.962.5 ± 3.6b74.1 ± 4.762.9 ± 3.0a
VP(mmHg)21.35 ± 3.0216.52 ± 1.87b22.08 ± 3.2619.43 ± 3.12a21.69 ± 2.7818.79 ± 3.15b

As shown in Table 2, the reduction of VP was significant after propranolol administration in each group. The percentage VP reduction in the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes was significantly greater than that in the Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes or compound heterozygotes (22.4% ± 2.1%, 13.1% ± 2.7% and 12.5% ± 3.1%, respectively, P < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Propranolol is a nonselective β-AR blocker and has been used to prevent variceal bleeding for many years. Propranolol prevents variceal bleeding and reduces HVPG via blocking β1-AR to decrease cardiac output, heart rate and cardiac constriction, and via blocking β2-AR to contract splanchnic veins and reduce splanchnic and portal blood flow[13,14,28]. However, the effect of propranolol varies in different patients and the drug fails to reduce of HVPG level in some patients who have a high risk of bleeding and mortality[29]. The discrepancy in the effect of propranolol in preventing variceal bleeding has attracted much research interest worldwide[30-32].

Recently, in an attempt to explore the role of β-AR in the regulation of vascular tension and hemodynamic response to β-AR, it was found that β2-AR gene polymorphisms played a key role in modulating cardiovascular function in humans[31,32]. In particular, two common mutations of β2-AR gene, +46 site G to A mutation and +79 site C to G mutation resulted in a change of amino acids of β2-AR from Arg16 to Gly16 and Gln27 to Glu27, which played a little or no role in affecting the state of illness. However, it might affect the response of propranolol administration individually[33,34].

Furthermore, it was found that homozygotes Gly16Gly or Glu27Glu genotype individual exhibit an enhanced vasodilatory response to isoproterenol infused through bronchial artery or arm vein locally[15-17]. A similar result was obtained for therapy of asthma with β2-adrenergic agents[35,36]. However, a study evaluating the role of β2-AR gene SNPs in portal hypertension is still lacking. There are individual discrepancies in the preventive effect of propranolol on variceal bleeding that might be associated with β2-AR SNPs. Patients with Gly16Gly or Glu27Glu homozygote genotype might benefit more from propranolol administration than those with Arg16 or Gln27 alleles[12]. Nevertheless, that study only revealed an acute HVPG response to intravenous administration of propranolol, and the VP response to oral propranolol is still unknown. Previous studies have demonstrated that VP is a major predictor of variceal bleeding risk and the response to pharmacological therapy in patients with portal hypertension[18-21]. For example, a VP level ≥ 15.2 mmHg represents a high risk of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis[19]. Therefore, studies on the VP response to propranolol treatment have clinical significance.

The present study assessed the prevalence of β2-AR gene polymorphism in a small subgroup of patients with cirrhosis. The prevalence of Gly16-Glu/Gln27 and Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes, and compound heterozygotes was 29.7%, 10.9%, and 59.4%, respectively. These data are similar to those in western studies and the US[12,26,27,37]. No significant differences in the basal heart rate and VP regarding the different β2-AR haplotypes were found before propranolol administration. An important result from our study was that patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension showed different responses to propranolol, as calculated by the reduction in VP. After administration of propranolol, patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes showed a greater reduction in VP, whereas patients with Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes exhibited a lesser reduction. The individuals who were compound heterozygotes had an intermediate response between Gly16-Glu/Gln27 and Arg16-Gln27 homozygotes.

The limitation of our study was that prevalence of β2-AR gene polymorphisms was investigated in a small subgroup of patients with cirrhosis, so, the assessment was not accurate. A prospective follow-up study of cirrhosis patients is underway to investigate the prevalence of β2-AR gene polymorphisms and analyze the impact of the polymorphisms on the hemodynamic effect of propranolol in esophageal varices.

In summary, we discovered that the individual differentiation of the effect of propranolol is associated with β2-AR 46 SNP. The replacement of amino acid 16 in the receptor from Arg to Gly results in an enhanced response to propranolol. Patients with an allele gene Gly benefit more from propranolol therapy than those with an Arg in long-term treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Professor Qiyi Tang, from the Department of Microbiology/AIDS program at Ponce School of Medicine, for language assistance.

COMMENTS
Background

Although β-blockers decrease the portal pressure in many cirrhosis patients, the response is not uniform. It was found that β-2 adrenergic receptor (β2-AR) gene is polymorphic within the human population and that the polymorphisms play a key role in modulating cardiovascular function. A more detailed study indicated that the two most common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) determined the hemodynamic response to propranolol occurred at codons 46 and 79. It was clear that β2-AR gene polymorphisms influenced the response of variceal pressure (VP) to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

Research frontiers

The authors explored whether β2-AR gene polymorphism influenced the response of VP to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The authors found that the VP response to propranolol was associated with polymorphism of β2-AR gene. Patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes probably benefited from propranolol therapy.

Applications

The results suggest that the patients with an allele gene Gly benefit more from propranolol therapy than those with an Arg in long-term treatment.

Terminology

The individual differentiation of the effect of propranolol is associated with β2-AR 46 SNP. The replacement of amino acid 16 in the receptor from Arg to Gly results in an enhanced response to propranolol. Patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 homozygotes probably benefit from propranolol therapy.

Peer-review

The paper evaluates the association between the effects of propranolol, variceal pressure and β2-AR gene polymorphism in a group of 64 non-related Chinese cirrhotic patients. The authors found that the variceal pressure response to propranolol was associated with β2-AR gene polymorphisms, and that the patients with the Gly16-Glu/Gln27 haplotypes seem to benefit more from propranolol therapy. This is an interesting paper, with original data.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: La Mura V, Li YY, Popescu I, Thomopoulos KC S- Editor: Ma YJ L- Editor: Kerr C E- Editor: Ma S

References
1.  Rahimi RS, Rockey DC. Complications of cirrhosis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:223-229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  de Franchis R, Primignani M. Natural history of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis. 2001;5:645-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 257]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 221]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  García-Pagán JC, Reverter E, Abraldes JG, Bosch J. Acute variceal bleeding. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33:46-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007;46:922-938.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Hsu YC, Lin JT, Chen TT, Wu MS, Wu CY. Long-term risk of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: a 10-year nationwide cohort study. Hepatology. 2012;56:698-705.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Cerqueira RM, Andrade L, Correia MR, Fernandes CD, Manso MC. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:551-557.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Dam Fialla A, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Touborg Lassen A. Incidence, etiology and mortality of cirrhosis: a population-based cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:702-709.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Zoller WG, Gross M. Beta-blockers for prophylaxis of bleeding from esophageal varices in cirrhotic portal hypertension. Review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 1996;1:407-416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Sarin SK, Wadhawan M, Agarwal SR, Tyagi P, Sharma BC. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol versus endoscopic variceal ligation alone in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:797-804.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 110]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 5.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Sharma P, Kumar A, Sharma BC, Sarin SK. Early identification of haemodynamic response to pharmacotherapy is essential for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with ‘high-risk’ varices. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:48-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Ho LI, Harn HJ, Chen CJ, Tsai NM. Polymorphism of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor in COPD in Chinese subjects. Chest. 2001;120:1493-1499.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Turnes J, Hernández-Guerra M, Abraldes JG, Bellot P, Oliva R, García-Pagán JC, Bosch J. Influence of beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene polymorphism on the hemodynamic response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2006;43:34-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Suk KT, Kim MY, Park DH, Kim KH, Jo KW, Hong JH, Kim JW, Kim HS, Kwon SO, Baik SK. Effect of propranolol on portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: a prospective study. Gut Liver. 2007;1:159-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Vilas-Boas WW, Ribeiro-Oliveira A, Ribeiro Rda C, Vieira RL, Almeida J, Nadu AP, Simões e Silva AC, Santos RA. Effect of propranolol on the splanchnic and peripheral renin angiotensin system in cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6824-6830.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Cockcroft JR, Gazis AG, Cross DJ, Wheatley A, Dewar J, Hall IP, Noon JP. Beta(2)-adrenoceptor polymorphism determines vascular reactivity in humans. Hypertension. 2000;36:371-375.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Dishy V, Sofowora GG, Xie HG, Kim RB, Byrne DW, Stein CM, Wood AJ. The effect of common polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenergic receptor on agonist-mediated vascular desensitization. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1030-1035.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 277]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 264]  [Article Influence: 11.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Garovic VD, Joyner MJ, Dietz NM, Boerwinkle E, Turner ST. Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor polymorphism and nitric oxide-dependent forearm blood flow responses to isoproterenol in humans. J Physiol. 2003;546:583-589.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Kleber G, Sauerbruch T, Fischer G, Paumgartner G. Pressure of intraoesophageal varices assessed by fine needle puncture: its relation to endoscopic signs and severity of liver disease in patients with cirrhosis. Gut. 1989;30:228-232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Nevens F, Bustami R, Scheys I, Lesaffre E, Fevery J. Variceal pressure is a factor predicting the risk of a first variceal bleeding: a prospective cohort study in cirrhotic patients. Hepatology. 1998;27:15-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 88]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  El Atti EA, Nevens F, Bogaerts K, Verbeke G, Fevery J. Variceal pressure is a strong predictor of variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis as well as in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Gut. 1999;45:618-621.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Escorsell A, Bordas JM, Castañeda B, Llach J, García-Pagán JC, Rodés J, Bosch J. Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2000;31:1061-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 118]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Kong DR, Xu JM, Zhang L, Zhang C, Fu ZQ, He BB, Sun B, Xie Y. Computerized endoscopic balloon manometry to detect esophageal variceal pressure. Endoscopy. 2009;41:415-420.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Brensing KA, Neubrand M, Textor J, Raab P, Müller-Miny H, Scheurlen C, Görich J, Schild H, Sauerbruch T. Endoscopic manometry of esophageal varices: evaluation of a balloon technique compared with direct portal pressure measurement. J Hepatol. 1998;29:94-102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Gertsch P, Fischer G, Kleber G, Wheatley AM, Geigenberger G, Sauerbruch T. Manometry of esophageal varices: comparison of an endoscopic balloon technique with needle puncture. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:1159-1166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Tajiri T, Yoshida H, Obara K, Onji M, Kage M, Kitano S, Kokudo N, Kokubu S, Sakaida I, Sata M. General rules for recording endoscopic findings of esophagogastric varices (2nd edition). Dig Endosc. 2010;22:1-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Israel E, Drazen JM, Liggett SB, Boushey HA, Cherniack RM, Chinchilli VM, Cooper DM, Fahy JV, Fish JE, Ford JG. The effect of polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor on the response to regular use of albuterol in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:75-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Drysdale CM, McGraw DW, Stack CB, Stephens JC, Judson RS, Nandabalan K, Arnold K, Ruano G, Liggett SB. Complex promoter and coding region beta 2-adrenergic receptor haplotypes alter receptor expression and predict in vivo responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10483-10488.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Saigal S, Chawla Y, Dilawari JB. Assessment of effects of propranolol on portal hemodynamics in cirrhosis by duplex ultrasonography. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1998;17:51-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  La Mura V, Abraldes JG, Raffa S, Retto O, Berzigotti A, García-Pagán JC, Bosch J. Prognostic value of acute hemodynamic response to i.v. propranolol in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2009;51:279-287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 84]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  De BK, Bandyopadhyay K, Das TK, Das D, Biswas PK, Majumdar D, Mandal SK, Ray S, Dasgupta S. Portal pressure response to losartan compared with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1371-1376.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Vardeny O, Peppard PE, Finn LA, Faraco JH, Mignot E, Hla KM. β2 adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and nocturnal blood pressure dipping status in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011;5:114-122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Lou Y, Liu J, Li Y, Liu Y, Wang Z, Liu K, Wu H, Niu Q, Gu W, Guo Y. Association study of the β2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms and hypertension in the Northern Han Chinese. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Al-Rubaish A. β2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms in normal and asthmatic individuals in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2011;31:586-590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Fu WP, Zhao ZH, Zhong L, Sun C, Fang LZ, Liu L, Zhang JQ, Wang L, Shu JK, Wang XM. Relationship between polymorphisms in the 5’ leader cistron, positions 16 and 27 of the adrenergic β2 receptor gene and asthma in a Han population from southwest China. Respirology. 2011;16:1221-1227.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Liggett SB. Genetic variability of the beta2 adrenergic receptor and asthma exacerbations. Thorax. 2006;61:925-927.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Sayers I, Hall IP. Pharmacogenetic approaches in the treatment of asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005;5:101-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Liggett SB. beta(2)-adrenergic receptor pharmacogenetics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:S197-S201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]