BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2026; 32(8): 115291
Published online Feb 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i8.115291
Figure 1
Figure 1 Treatment sequence and model structure for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease. ADA: Adalimumab; IFX: Infliximab; UST: Ustekinumab; VDZ: Vedolizumab.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Cost-effectiveness scatter plot of different treatment sequences for biologic-naïve Crohn’s disease patients. ADA: Adalimumab; IFX: Infliximab; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years; UST: Ustekinumab; VDZ: Vedolizumab.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Tornado diagram for one-way sensitivity analysis: Sequence 1 (vedolizumab-ustekinumab) vs sequence 3 (adalimumab-ustekinumab) in biologic-naïve Crohn’s disease patients. ADA: Adalimumab; Bio: Biologics; ICER: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; IFX: Infliximab; OR: Odds ratio; PBO: Placebo; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years; SAEs: Serious adverse events; UST: Ustekinumab; VDZ: Vedolizumab.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Cost-effectiveness scatter plot of sequence 1 (vedolizumab-ustekinumab) vs sequence 3 (adalimumab-ustekinumab) in biologic-naïve Crohn’s disease patients. PSA: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis; QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of treatment sequences vs sequence 1 for biologic-naïve Crohn’s disease patients. QALYs: Quality-adjusted life years.