Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Figure 1 Flow-chart of patient selection.
MWA: Microwave ablation; Mbp-RFA: Multibipolar radiofrequency ablation; AFP: Alpha-fetoprotein.
Figure 2 Representative depictions of ablation margins and local tumor progression after thermoablation on magnetic resonance imaging.
A: A portal phase magnetic resonance imaging performed one month post multibipolar radiofrequency ablation showing optimal (> 5 mm) ablation margins between the original lesion (arrowheads) and the ablation zone (arrows); B: An arterial phase magnetic resonance imaging showing the appearance of a local tumor progression (arrow) after microwave ablation occurring between the ablation zone (arrowhead) and the inferior vena cava (blue arrowhead).
Figure 3 Comparison of local recurrence free probability and overall survival between microwave ablation and multibipolar radio frequency.
A: Red line represents cumulative local progression-free survival for microwave ablation; black line represents cumulative local progression-free survival for multibipolar radiofrequency ablation. Levels of significance: P < 0.001 (inverse probability of treatment weighting mixed effects cox regression); B: Red line represent overall survival for microwave ablation; black line represents overall survival for multibipolar radiofrequency ablation. Levels of significance: P = 0.256 (inverse probability of treatment weighting mixed effects cox regression). MO: Microwave ablation; RF: Multibipolar radiofrequency ablation.
- Citation: Bahloul C, Rode A, Pradat P, Milot L, Dumortier J, Merle P, Mabrut JY, Boussel L, Della Corte A. Multibipolar radiofrequency vs single needle microwave ablation for the treatment of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113810
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i2/113810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
