Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2025; 31(45): 113848
Published online Dec 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.113848
Published online Dec 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.113848
Figure 1 Receiver operating characteristic analysis.
A: Age [cutoff value: 60, sensitivity: 0.837, specificity: 0.451, area under the curve (AUC): 0.676]; B: Child-Pugh score (cutoff value: 9, sensitivity: 0.551, specificity: 0.725, AUC: 0.694); C: Liver volume (cutoff value: 1057, sensitivity: 0.621, specificity: 0.771, AUC: 0.692).
Figure 2 Overall survival.
The overall survival rate was significantly higher in grade A patients than in grade B patients.
- Citation: Hamaguchi A, Ueda J, Taniai N, Yoshioka M, Matsushita A, Mizutani S, Kawano Y, Shimizu T, Kanda T, Murokawa T, Takata H, Furuki H, Aoki Y, Kawashima M, Irie T, Ono T, Haruna T, Yoshimori D, Yoshida H. Prognostic factors for peritoneovenous shunt placement for refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(45): 113848
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i45/113848.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i45.113848