BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2025; 31(44): 113650
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i44.113650
Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic for air collection. A: Endoscopic procedures; B: Enzymolysis gauze; C: Anderson six-stage impact microorganism sampler diagram. The device operates by directing air through a perforated screen plate to an agar plate.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Quantification of airborne bacterial load. A: Covering the biopsy hole check valve with enzymolysis gauze significantly reduced Gram-positive bacterial load near the endoscopist; B and C: In the control (B) and experimental (C) groups, bacterial load during insertion was higher than during withdrawal; D and E: Comparison of bacterial loads between the two groups during insertion (D) and withdrawal (E); F: Bacterial load (colony-forming unit/m3) before, during, and after a daily colonoscopy schedule; G: Bioaerosol accumulation during a representative endoscopy day. Lower aerosol levels were observed in the enzymolysis gauze group. CFU: Colony-forming unit.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Correlation between intestinal cleanliness and bacterial load. A: Control group; B: Experimental group. CFU: Colony-forming unit; BBPS: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Proportion of bacterial species identified. A: Top four bacterial species in the control group; B: Top four bacterial species in the experimental group.