Application of enhanced recovery after gastric cancer surgery: An updated meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 24, Issue 14

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (10880)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-13) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

606

WORD

225

HTML

6230

Figures (1-13)

603

Tables (1-3)

213

Sum=7877

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1155

Download

1848

Sum=3003

Apr 14, 2018 (publication date) through Nov 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (63)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2018; 24(14): 1562-1578
Published online Apr 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Study flow diagram: Enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric cancer. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; RCTs: Randomized controlled trials.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Risk of bias summary: Review of authors' judgments concerning each risk-of-bias item for each included study.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot evaluating the relative risk of surgical complications: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Forest plot evaluating the relative risk of short-term mortality: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Forest plot evaluating the length of postoperative hospital stay: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Forest plot evaluating the duration of intestinal function recovery: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 7 Forest plot evaluating the difference in total medical costs: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 8 Forest plot evaluating the incidence of readmission and reoperation within 30 d: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 9 Forest plot evaluating the postoperative level of C-reactive protein: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. CRP: C-reactive protein; ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 10 Forest plot evaluating the postoperative level of IL-6: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; IL: Interleukin; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 11 Forest plot evaluating the postoperative level of serum albumin: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ALB: Albumin; ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 12 Forest plot evaluating health-related quality of life: Enhanced recovery after surgery vs standard care. ERAS: Enhanced recovery after surgery; SC: Standard care.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 13 Begg’s funnel plot to explore publication bias of all the included studies.

Citation: Wang LH, Zhu RF, Gao C, Wang SL, Shen LZ. Application of enhanced recovery after gastric cancer surgery: An updated meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(14): 1562-1578
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v24/i14/1562.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i14.1562