Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2013; 19(6): 917-922
Published online Feb 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.917
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 Comparisons of T-lymphocyte subsets percentage between early enteral nutrition and delayed enteral nutrition groups. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). A: Comparison of CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentage between early enteral nutrition (EEN) and delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups; B: Comparison of CD8+ T-lymphocyte percentage between EEN and DEN groups; C: Comparison of CD4+/CD8+ ratio between EEN and DEN groups. aP < 0.05, EEN groups vs DEN groups.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Comparisons of immunoglobulin subtypes between early enteral nutrition and delayed enteral nutrition groups. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). A: Comparison of immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels between early enteral nutrition (EEN) and delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups; B: Comparison of IgM levels between EEN and DEN groups; C: Comparison of IgA levels between EEN and DEN groups. aP < 0.05, EEN groups vs DEN groups.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Comparisons of human leukocyte antigen-DR expression and C-reactive protein levels between early enteral nutrition and delayed enteral nutrition groups. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). A: Comparison of human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) expression between early enteral nutrition (EEN) and delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups; B: Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between EEN and DEN groups. aP < 0.05, EEN groups vs DEN groups.