BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2026; 32(22): 117500
Published online Jun 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i22.117500
Bone and renal safety of initial antiviral therapy using tenofovir alafenamide fumarate or entecavir for chronic hepatitis B
Hui-Bin Ning, Hui-Ming Jin, Zhen Peng, Kuan Li, Jia Shang
Hui-Bin Ning, Hui-Ming Jin, Zhen Peng, Kuan Li, Jia Shang, Department of Infectious Diseases, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China
Author contributions: Ning HB designed the research and wrote the first manuscript; Ning HB, Jin HM, Peng Z and Li K contributed to conceiving the research and analyzing data; Ning HB and Shang J conducted the analysis and provided guidance for the research; all authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethic Committee of Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 21, 2019.
Informed consent statement: All the study subjects provided informed consent.
Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Corresponding author: Jia Shang, Chief Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 7 Weiwu Road, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan Province, China. shangjia666@126.com
Received: January 6, 2026
Revised: January 29, 2026
Accepted: March 17, 2026
Published online: June 14, 2026
Processing time: 142 Days and 19.5 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: Nucleoside/nucleotide analogs are currently the core drugs for the antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Among them, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) are recommended as first-line treatment regimens in domestic and international guidelines due to their potent antiviral activity and low resistance rates. However, direct comparative data between TAF and ETV remain limited, particularly in long-term follow-up studies of Chinese CHB populations. The long-term differences in bone and renal safety between TAF and ETV warrant further investigation. Therefore, this study aims to provide critical insights for optimizing individualized treatment strategies for CHB by comparing the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of ETV and TAF.

Write to the Help Desk