Published online Apr 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i14.2202
Peer-review started: November 19, 2022
First decision: November 30, 2022
Revised: December 10, 2022
Accepted: March 14, 2023
Article in press: March 14, 2023
Published online: April 14, 2023
Processing time: 144 Days and 14.4 Hours
Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (GML) is usually a low-grade, B-cell neoplasia strongly associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-induced chronic gastritis. As such, clinical practice guidelines currently recommend H. pylori eradication as the preferred initial treatment for early-stage GML.
Studies that aim to evaluate the effects of H. pylori eradication on early-stage GML are generally small and heterogenous single-arm uncontrolled observational studies. Hence, we recognized the need for an updated powerful statistical synthesis of the available evidence regarding the practical effect of H. pylori eradication as sole initial therapy for early-stage GML.
We aimed to perform a systematic review with an up-to-date proportional meta-analysis (P-MA) to assess the complete remission (CR) rate of H. pylori-positive early-stage GML after bacterial eradication therapy.
We performed independent computer-assisted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central databases culling reports published before September 2022. Prospective and retrospective observational studies evaluating the CR rate of early-stage GML after bacterial eradication therapy in H. pylori-positive patients were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. We followed the random-effects model to calculate the pooled estimate of the complete histopathological remission rate and respective confidence intervals (95%CI). We used Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic to assess the heterogeneity and inconsistency, and we set the threshold for heterogeneity as P < 0.01 and I² > 50%, respectively. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.
P-MA highlighted that the overall CR of H. pylori-positive early-stage GML after bacterial eradication was 75.18% (95%CI: 70.45%-79.91%). On the other hand, the substantial heterogeneity observed across studies (I2 = 92%; P < 0.01) limits, but does not preclude, the interpretation of the pooled overall CR rate. Subgroup analysis revealed that retrospective and prospective studies presented similar overall CR rate estimates after eradication therapy: 75.51% (95%CI: 64.96%-86.07%; I2 = 96%; P < 0.01) and 75.08% (95%CI: 69.80%-80.36%; I2 = 89%; P < 0.01), respectively. Nevertheless, meta-regression analysis indicated that the proportion of patients with t(11;18)(q21;q21)-positive GML and the studies’ risk of bias were sources of heterogeneity. More precisely, studies with greater than 30% of patients with t(11;18)(q21;q21)-positive GML and high risk of bias decrease in 0.40 (95%CI: -0.59 to -0.22; P < 0.0001) and 0.43 (95%CI: -0.77 to -0.09; P = 0.0139) the pooled estimate of the CR rate, respectively.
Comprehensive evidence synthesis suggests the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication as the sole initial therapy for early-stage GML. Although the substantial heterogeneity observed across studies limits the interpretation of the pooled overall CR rate, the present study is a relevant alternative for informing clinical practice.
Inadequate reporting was an important reason for the exclusion of studies during screening and a complicating factor for data extraction. As reliable and robust studies are scarce in our field, we emphasize that proper reporting of the available evidence is vital to inform clinical practice. Further robust comparative observational studies are needed to identify predictive factors for GML remission following H. pylori eradication and to provide more reliable evidence in our field.