Published online Oct 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i37.5483
Peer-review started: June 2, 2022
First decision: August 1, 2022
Revised: August 9, 2022
Accepted: September 20, 2022
Article in press: September 20, 2022
Published online: October 7, 2022
Processing time: 118 Days and 22.1 Hours
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is critical for ESCC detection; however, endoscopists require long-term training to avoid missing superficial lesions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly investigated to assist endoscopic diagnosis.
AI has shown promising results for endoscopic diagnosis of superficial ESCC. However, few AI-based computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems for ESCC that support white-light and narrow-band imaging have been applied in clinical practice.
We aimed to develop a CAD system for endoscopic detection of superficial ESCC and investigate its application value.
We configured the CAD system for white-light and narrow-band imaging modes based on the YOLO v5 algorithm. A total of 4447 images from 837 patients and 1695 images from 323 patients were included in the training and testing datasets, respectively. Two experts and two non-expert endoscopists reviewed the testing dataset independently and with computer assistance. The diagnostic performance was evaluated in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the CAD system were 0.982 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.969-0.994], 92.9% (95%CI: 89.5%-95.2%), 91.9% (95%CI: 87.4%-94.9%), and 94.7% (95%CI: 89.0%-97.6%), respectively. The accuracy of CAD was significantly higher than that of non-expert endoscopists (78.3%, P < 0.001 compared with CAD) and comparable to that of expert endoscopists (91.0%, P = 0.129 compared with CAD). After referring to the CAD results, the accuracy of the non-expert endoscopists significantly improved (88.2% vs 78.3%, P < 0.001).
The diagnostic performance of the CAD system is promising and may assist in improving detectability, particularly for inexperienced endoscopists.
An updated CAD system that can process real-time videos or images with suboptimal quality is in development. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to investigate the clinical pragmaticality.